Michael Bennet heads to the Senate

January 3, 2009

I scheduled a no-Internet trip for the first three days of 2009 (my first prolonged break from the web in more than two years!), and I thought it was unlikely that many developments would unfold in what are typically slow news days. Little did I know that in that short time period Colorado would get a new Senator and Minnesota’s recount would evolve dramatically - not to mention the contradictory reporting on Caroline Kennedy’s New York chances and the increasingly tense standoff between Roland Burris and Senate Democrats.

You are probably aware of all of these stories by now, but here is my belated take on soon-to-be Senator Michael Bennet. (An update on Minnesota will follow soon.)

There was a long list of Democrats lined up for Ken Salazar’s Senate seat, but Governor Bill Ritter went for a dark-horse candidate few people had thought of including in their list of serious contenders. Colorado’s new Senator will be Michael Bennet, the Denver School Superintendent who was also on the short list to be Obama’s Secretary of Education.

Ritter is known as a conservative Democrat, and it was considered unlikely that he would pick someone who would satisfy progressives. That said, Bennet looks to be among the most centrists of Ritter’s potential choices. As School Superintendent, he is known as a “reformer” and a supporter of merit pay and tough standards for teachers. This suggests a tasty relationships with union leaders - this could be crucial in the upcoming Senate battle over card-checks, expected to be one of the hottest issues facing the 111th Congress. (For more about Bennet’s work with Denver schools, this 2007 New Yorker profile is the place to go.)

Ritter himself emphasized Bennet’s centrist politics, describing him with the “postpartisan” terminology that has become the cloak of the ideological center. “He is practical, pragmatic, not ideological. And he is not dogmatic… He has an impressive record of bringing people together to find common ground.” Bennet described himself similarly and pledged to follow in Ken Salazar’s “bootsteps”  (Salazar is known as one of the most conservative Democrats in the Senate).

Commentators are indeed comparing Bennet’s politics to those of Ritter, Salazar and Betsy Markey, all conservative Democrats. Meanwhile, the Colorado Republican Party chairman commented that Bennet had done “admirable” things in Denver; Bennet was also described as “fairly moderate” by Scott McInnis, a potential GOP candidate in 2010; and another School Superintendent called Bennet’s pick “encouraging” “from a Republican perspective.”

Besides frustrating progressives, Ritter’s choice could also worry the DSCC and those Democrats who care about retaining the seat in 2010, and this for three simple reasons:

  1. Bennet has had little experience in politics and has never held elected office. It is always dangerous for someone who has never had to seriously campaign to be suddenly thrust in the limelight (see Clark, Wesley; Palin, Sarah; and even Thompson, Fred), and missteps could be costly in what is sure to be one of the top races of the 2010 cycle. This is not to say that Bennet has failed to engage with meaty policy issues like Caroline Kennedy (as the New Yorker profile attests to), simply that the policy and electoral worlds are very different.
  2. A number of highly credible Republicans are thinking of jumping in the race, and Bennet lacks the profile to scare them away from the race in a way Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper might have. Furthermore, Bennet lacks the political network to be a terrifying fundraising machine, something else that might have kept challengers from jumping in. In other words, it looks fairly certain that Bennet will attract strong opposition in two years.
  3. Republicans are already salivating at Bennet’s Denver-centrist record. This Rocky Mountain News story is certainly worth a read to get a sense of rural Democrats’ annoyance at Ritter’s choice. While this is certainly not a damning problem (Mark Udall was supposedly too Boulder-centric to win statewide), it could prove one if Bennet does not prepare himself sufficiently to address concerns like conservation and water that matter in Colorado. Fortunately for him, he now has 18 months to study these issues before the general election heats up.

At the very least, Bennet should not be that worried about a primary challenge. The Denver/rural Colorado split could be his biggest liability, followed by the fact that he lacks an obvious constituency that could form his electoral base. But it is hard to see who could rise to challenge him: He and Hickenlooper (the highest profile Democrat in the state) are friends, and the other Democratic contenders are either not high-profile enough or would have to give up a safe House seat for a difficult primary race. In other words, the Democratic nomination is Bennet’s to lose.


Appointment headaches: Roland, Diana and Caroline

December 31, 2008

Just a week after making it clear she was hoping to be appointed to Ken Salazar’s vacant Senate seat, Rep. Diana DeGette removed herself from consideration, saying that she preferred to stay in the House where she has been rising in the Democratic leadership.

DeGette was the most liberal of the Democrats that were mentioned as Salazar’s possible successors, and it was considered unlikely that moderate-to-conservative Governor Bill Ritter would appoint someone with her ideological profile. The best progressives can hope for is for Ritter to choose Rep. Ed Permlutter over Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper or Rep. John Salazar.

DeGette’s withdrawal is also noteworthy in the context of the gender discussion she herself launched last week when she noted that Colorado had never had a female Senator or Governor. But DeGette is now the third high-profile woman to remove her name from consideration, after the state’s Lieutenant Governor and Treasurer.

(It might be unfair to lump DeGette with Illinois’s embattled Roland Burris and New York’s challenged Caroline Kennedy, but hopefully the Denver congresswoman will forgive me for doing just that in this post’s title.)

In Illinois, meanwhile, Rep. Bobby Rush raised the stakes further in the battle over Raymond Burris’s appointment. A day after using the racially chard word “lynch” to warn the Senate, Rush compared Burris’s critics to George Wallace and other segregationists from the 1950s:

“You know, the recent history of our nation has shown us that sometimes there could be individuals and there could be situations where schoolchildren — where you have officials standing in the doorway of schoolchildren. You know, I’m talking about all of us back in 1957 in Little Rock, Ark. I’m talking about George Wallace, Bull Connor and I’m sure that the U.S. Senate don’t want to see themselves placed in the same position.

Senate Democrats can consider themselves warned.

In an interesting development, Rep. Danny Davis - another African-American House member mentioned as a possible Senator before Blagojevich’s arrest - revealed that he had been offered the Senate seat a few days ago but that he refused the job; only then did the Governor contact Burris. This confirms that Blagojevich was looking to fill Obama’s seat with a black Senator, either because he cares about ensuring racial diversity in the US Senate or because he is cynically trying to exploit racial divisions to extend his lease in the Governor’s mansion.

In New York, finally, Kennedy suffered days of bad press in the hands of the New York press, especially in the Gray Lady. The main issue was her connection to New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, as I explained a few days ago. The New York Post now reports, however, that Bloomberg’s allies are now pulling away from actively supporting Kennedy’s bid because they think that their efforts have “backfired.”

The Post adds that the plan was to make Kennedy look so inevitable as to quickly lock in support of most prominent state Democrats, but the situation played out a bit differently as Kennedy attracted the vitriol of officials like Sheldon Silver.

Another interesting came out from David Paterson’s side of the story: The Governor just interviewed Assemblyman Danny O’Donnell, whose name had not yet circulated in connection to the Senate seat. O’Donnell would be the country’s first openly gay Senator.

It is hard to tell whether Caroline Kennedy’s odds have truly fallen over the past week or whether her appointment has become so certain that her allies are simply trying to create diversions for Kennedy to avoid looking inevitable and too dynastically entitled. That also applies to Paterson’s public efforts to show he is still undecided; Rep. Charlie Rangel did say last week that Paterson had already settled on an appointee, after all.


Colorado’s seat: Gender concerns, Dem withdrawals and the GOP field

December 27, 2008

Stung that she was not considered a top contender for Ken Salazar’s Senate seat, Rep. Diana DeGette has ensured that her name will part of the conversation by injecting gender as an important consideration.

The abysmally low number of African-American and Hispanic Senators have made race one of the factors discussed in relation to the IL, NY and CO appointments, but the small number of female Senators has generally not been addressed. But Colorado’s particularly poor gender record gave DeGette an opening.

It’s kind of ridiculous that after all these years, we’ve never had a woman [as governor or U.S. senator],” DeGette pointed out. “I don’t think the press or the chattering class seriously consider any of the women candidates.”

In fact, based on my quick research, no woman has won the Democratic or the Republican nomination in a gubernatorial or senatorial race since 1998, when two women topped the state’s Democratic ticket and lost to Senator Ben Campbell and soon-to-be-Governor Bill Owens.

Yet, the prospect of a female Senator decreased this week when Lieutenant Governor Barbara O’Brien and State Treasurer Cary Kennedy withdrew their name from consideration, limiting the number of women Governor Bill Ritter will consider. (This same phenomenon happened in New York, where Reps. Nydia Velasquez Nita Lowey announced they did not want Hillary’s Senate seat even though they were considered front-runners for the position.)

This leaves DeGette and former state Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald as the to women contenders for Salazar’s seat; EMILY’s List has been pushing oil heiress Swanee Hunt. The latter doesn’t live in Colorado, so it might be a bit of a stretch for Ritter to bypass state Democrats to choose a Massachusetts resident.

Two other important developments in Colorado concern male contenders. First is the withdrawal of Bill Clinton’s Transportation Secretary and former Denver Mayor Federico Peña. It was speculated that it would be hard for Salazar to deny Peña the post if he wanted it, so this certainly clears the field for other candidates - starting with Denver’s current Mayor.

John Hickenlooper confirmed his interest in the Senate seat for the first time this week, adding that he had already had a “formal” conversation with Ritter. Hickenlooper explained that, “If you take someone like me who has spent most of his life in business and then at some point decides to give 10 to 15 years to public service, and you want to be useful, then you want to get the maximum benefit out of that public service.”

On the GOP side, meanwhile, there is unsurprisingly far less movement. It is hard to blame potential Republican candidates for taking their time when they do not know who they would have to face in 2010 - and whether Ritter’s appointment might limit other seats.

For instance, U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said last week that he was eying a Senate run but that he might also run in the state’s 7th congressional district if Ritter chooses Rep. Ed Perlmutter as Senator. (Let this be a reminder that a Perlmutter pick would pave the way to a competitive special election this spring.)

Other potential Republican candidates who have acknowledged their interest include Rep. Tom Tancredo, state Attorney General John Suthers and former Rep. Scott McInnis. I do not believe that Bill Owens or John Elway have recently made public statements. I remain skeptical that either would run after they passed on an open seat in 2008.


Poll watch: Dems well positioned in Colorado, Hawaii

December 19, 2008

Public Policy Polling wasted no time before conducting its first poll of Colorado’s Senate race, testing two of the best known Democratic contenders against high-profile potential Republican challengers:

  • Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper beats former Governor Bill Owens 54% to 42%; he crushes Rep. Tom Tancredo 54% to 37%.
  • Rep. Joe Salazar beats Owens 52% to 43% and Tancredo 53% to 40%.

All four of these candidates have enough of a statewide profile to make the poll worthwhile; and the results are very encouraging for Democrats. Owens, who was Governor until 2006, is generally considered to be the strongest Republican candidate - and he isn’t even a sure candidate since he passed on an open seat race in 2008. Tancredo, on the hand, faces clear electability issues; he is a controversial figure with a very conservative profile. That Owen is only minimally outperforming Tancredo is a troubling sign for the GOP.

Has Colorado swung so blue that any Republican would start the race with a double-digit deficit? And don’t forget that whichever Democrat is nominated will have been a two-year incumbent by the time he faces voters in 2010, making the Republicans’ task even more daunting.

In Hawaii, meanwhile, a Research 2000 poll tested a match-up between longtime incumbent Daniel Inouye and the only Republican who could make the race competitive, Governor Linda Lingle. Lingle is term-limited and cannot run for re-election in 2010; in other words, she has nothing to lose in a senatorial run.

Inouye leads 53% to 42%, a significant though not overwhelming advantage that could reassure both parties. On the one hand, Lingle’s 2002 election might have been a major breakthrough for Hawaii Republicans - but she is not popular enough to endanger the Democrats’ control on the Senate seat (for now). And despite his old age (he is 84), Inouye retains a good approval rating (58% to 37%).

On the other hand, these numbers suggest that Lingle would have a shot at an upset, especially if Inouye has a few senior moments. Furthermore, Lingle could be a formidable candidate if Inouye were to retire. She also has a solid approval rating (53% to 41%); if she remains within 11% of Inouye - who has represented Hawaii in Congress since it achieves statewood - she could certainly be competitive against other Democrats.


Vacancies: Blago promises he won’t do it, speculation mounts in CO

December 19, 2008

It might not come with the taint of a juicy scandal or with the glamor of Camelot, but Colorado’s Senate seat is now also up for grabs and Gov. Bill Ritter has a difficult decision ahead of him.

After a few days of mounting speculation, the field of contenders has partially sorted itself. In particular, Rep. Joe Salazar no longer appears to be the front-runner people described him as in the first hours after his brother’s appointment. His district is too conservative for Democrats to risk losing it in a spring special election.

A front-page article in today’s Denver Post explains that the two favorites are Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper and Rep. Ed Perlmutter (CO-07). There is a clear divide between the two, as Hickenlooper has a more conservative profile and is opposed by labor while Perlmutter is considered friendly with unions. This contrast on labor is especially important given that a close vote on ENCA is looming in the Senate.

Two other top contenders are former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff and former US Attorney Thomas Strickland. Romanoff has a relatively liberal profile, while Strickland is a top executive as a top health insurance company - not to mention that he has lost two Senate races in the state in 1996 and 2002.

Yet another name is Rep. Diana DeGette, who represents Denver and has perhaps the most liberal profile of all of these names. This is a problem because Bill Ritter is a conservative Democrat and it is difficult to imagine him privileging a progressive pick; this is especially in the case given that national Democrats will surely use the electability argument to insist that he not pick a more liberal option. (Mark Udall’s liberal profile demonstrated that Colorado can elect progressive Senators, however.)

DeGette also made the good point that Colorado has never had a female Senator or Governor, putting pressure on Ritter to go down that route. And of course, many Democrats would like to see a Hispanic appointment since Salazar’s departure reduces the number of Latino Senators to two. The name of former Clinton Transportation Secretary Federico Peña is circulating.

In Illinois, meanwhile, Democrats just got their best news since the Blagojevich scandal exploded as the embattled Governor signaled yesterday that he had no plans of appointing Obama’s successor. Said Blago’s attorney, “Harry Reid said that they’re not going to accept anybody he appoints, so why would he do that?”

One of the Democrats’ biggest worries was that Blagojevich would attempt a last-minute coup by appointing a Senator (perhaps even himself), which would embarass Senate Democrats into denying that person his seat and further disgrace this entire process. Such a scenario will not occur.

This could give Democrats cover not to strip the governor of his appointment powers. That Blago exercise his prerogative at any moment was the most important reason Democrats were advocating for a special election - but they can now back off their commitment to do so without looking like they are leaving Blagojevich an opening. After all, Democrats were rapidly already stepping away from a special election vote even prior to this development.


Salazar at Interior

December 15, 2008

Colorado’s Ken Salazar looks set to be tapped as Secretary of the Interior, making him the fourth Democratic Senator to exit the chamber due to Barack Obama’s presidential victory. (News also spread tonight that Obama has picked Arne Duncan as Secretary of Education, a higher-profile position but a designation with no obvious electoral implications.)

The Salazar pick means that there will be yet another gubernatorial appointment to speculate about - though hopefully no Kennedy to monopolize the attention in this state as well.

The Colorado Governor is Democrat Bill Ritter, so Salazar’s immediate successor will be a Democrat; he or she will face voters for the first time in November 2010 - just like Hillary Clinton’s, Joe Biden’s and perhaps Barack Obama’s.

Salazar was up for re-election in 2010, so this will not add an additional seat for Democrats to defend. Salazar was also not safe to start with; a recent poll showed him leading potential challengers but sporting a mediocre approval rating. His replacement could still create additional complications depending on how strong a contender Ritter appoints - and whether he designates a caretaker or someone who will run for re-election.

Thankfully for Democrats, they have a fairly extensive bench in Colorado while the GOP has a much thinner one. After all, Democrats won three open gubernatorial and senatorial races since 2004, a testament to the strength of their candidate’s and of the state’s drifting blue.

Ritter could choose one of the House members - most notably John Salazar, Ken’s brother. (However, it might be politically difficult for Ritter to appoint Ken’s brother after the Blagojevich scandal raised the scrutiny surrounding gubernatorial appointments. Other House members Ritter might appoint are Diana DeGette or Ed Perlmutter. A Salazar or Perlmutter pick could result in competitive House special elections.)

Salazar could also choose Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, a popular politician who is often rumored for statewide runs but never takes the jump. Hickenlooper might have the easiest time winning re-election in 2010. Other potential contenders are state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff and Tom Strickland, who lost highly competitive Senate races in 1996 and 2002.

One thing to keep in mind is that Salazar is one of the Senate’s most conservative Democrats, so his departure might lead to a more liberal Senator. However, Ritter is also a very moderate politician who made sure to praise Salazar’s “centrism” tonight. We should thus not expect Ritter to make a point of appointing a particularly progressive replacement - quite the contrary.

Another curious consequence of the Salazar pick is that Senator-elect Mark Udall will become Colorado’s senior Senator shortly after being sworn in for the first time. (John Kerry has been Massachussetts’s junior Senator since he was first elected in 1984.)


Poll watch: Virginia will be tight, Salazar ahead but vulnerable

December 8, 2008

Virginia’s gubernatorial election will be held next November - in “only” 11 months - and Rasmussen just released the contest’s first poll, testing the three declared Democratic candidates against the probable Republican nominee Attorney General Robert McDonnell.

All match-ups are close, testifying to Virginia’s status as a swing state and confirming that the race will keep us entertained over the next year (New Jersey’s gubernatorial election is also scheduled for next November, though Gov. Corzine’s vulnerability remains to be tested):

  • The highest-profile Democrat, former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe, is the weakest general election candidate: He trails McDonnell 41% to 36%.
  • Two other Democrats perform better: state Senator Deeds, who lost the 2005 AG race against McDonnell by a few hundred votes, ties McDonnell once again (at 39%); state Delegate Brian Moran leads 41% to 37%.

As is expected at this early stage, all match-ups have a high number of undecided voters. Another reason that the race is largely unpredictable is that Obama’s popularity next fall will likely be an important factor in this race. For now, all we can say is that the race is wide open.

Meanwhile, Research 2000 released a poll of Colorado’s upcoming senatorial race, testing conservative Democratic incumbent Ken Salazar against two potential opponents:

  • Salazar is under 50% in one of the match-ups, as he leads former football star John Elway 48% to 39%. Salazar leads 51% to 37% against retiring and short-lived presidential candidate Rep. Tom Tancredo.

Salazar’s mediocre approval numbers (48-41) are a clear sign that he is vulnerable, but Republicans have no obvious candidate to jump in the race against him as their bench has gotten thin after successive defeat in the past three cycles (in that time, Democrats picked-up both Senate seats, the governor’s mansion and three of the seven House seats). Elway is enough of a celebrity to perhaps start the race in a credible position, while Tancredo is likely too conservative to unseat an incumbent statewide.

The RNSC will have to work very hard to make the most of Salazar’s vulnerability: Strong recruitment by the GOP will be difficult but critical.


Poll watch: McCain tightens national race and PA but remains far behind; McConnell pulls ahead

November 2, 2008

Update: Two new national polls should help Obama supporters sleep tonight. First, it appears that CBS News is now also conducting a tracking poll, as they just released their second national poll in two days. The margin remains the same, 54% to 41% for Obama among likely voters. Second, the final Gallup/USA Today poll just came out and finds Obama leading 53% to 42% among likely voters; this poll was conducted Friday through today, and carries a huge sample of more than 2400 respondents. Obama led by 7% three weeks ago in this poll, meaning that there is no consistent evidence that the race has tightened. [To make things clear: It appears that this latter poll is Gallup's tracking poll released half-a-day early.]

Original post: McCain has made gains nationally, and there are some signs undecided voters appear to be breaking towards the Republican more than towards his opponent (all polls do not agree on this). He has made gains in Pennsylvania. But 48 hours from polls closing, he is still in a deep hole at the national level and in a number of states that have become must-wins, starting with the Keystone State.

Three new Pennsylvania polls conducted over the past three days have Obama leading by 6% and 7%, certainly a smaller margin than Obama enjoyed just 10 days ago (he has lost 6% in Morning Call in four days and 5% in SUSA in a week) but still a substantial advantage. Unless something dramatic happens tomorrow, it is hard to imagine how McCain can reverse a deficit that all polls agree is at least in the mid-single digits. (Furthermore, Rasmussen’s poll conducted yesterday has him gaining 2% for a 6% lead; since we have to assume that polls are dramatically understating McCain’s support in Pennsylvania if we want to seriously look at the possibility of his comeback bid seriously, which makes trendlines very important.)

Pennsylvania is not a state in which Democrats are likely to be caught by surprise; it is a state in which they have a strong operation and a machine that allowed Al Gore and John Kerry to eke out narrow victories in the past two presidential elections. It is also a state in which they have made gains over the past four years (just read today’s “one year ago today” excerpt in the sidebar). On the other hand, it is a state in which racial factors could disrupt the results if there is indeed such a thing as a Bradley effect; it is also a state in which there is no early voting, meaning that Obama has not locked in any state. In other words, it is as good a state as any for McCain to make his last stand.

At the national level, the bottom line remains the same: Pew and CNN released their final polls, and, while the latter shows McCain gaining a massive 9% in one week as undecideds heavily break towards him, both show Obama retaining a comfortable lead. Similarly, the tracking polls are going in both directions, suggesting most of the movement is statistical noise, and all but IBD/TIPP find a solid lead for the Illinois Senator. Overall, Obama is at or above 50% in eight of the nine national polls released today; McCain’s support ranges from 43% to 46%.

Despite what we are hearing left and right, this suggests that there isn’t that much discrepancy between national polls. And even if a number of surveys suggests that undecided voters are moving towards the Republican nominee, he will have to grab the lion share of undecideds while also pulling away support from Obama. That’s a tall order three days from the election, especially because a fair amount of remaining undecideds are disgruntled Republicans unhappy with Bush. Getting them home is a necessary condition for McCain to mount a comeback, but it is not sufficient.

What is perhaps most worrisome for McCain is that Pennsylvania might not even matter if Obama loses the Keystone State but sweeps Colorado, Nevada and Virginia - which new polls suggests he very well might, despite some tightening in polls from the Old Dominion.

However, here is what gives Republicans some hope: For one, the movement among undecideds. Second, the belief that nearly all pollsters are using a false turnout model. Today’s seven Mason-Dixon polls force us to take that possibility seriously, as Mason-Dixon is a very serious polling outfit that has had great success in past cycles. Like seemingly every other poll they have released this cycle, Mason-Dixon’s polls are more favorable to McCain than other pollsters, suggesting that if Mason-Dixon had a national tracking poll they would find a somewhat tighter race than other firms. The early voting data suggests that turnout will be favorable to Democrats, but such disputes are of course why elections are not decided by polls but by voters… (Note, also, that Mason-Dixon’s polls were conducted Tuesday and Wednesday, making them somewhat outdated.)

  • Obama leads 53% to 46% in CNN’s final national poll conducted Friday and Saturday. Obama has a 8% lead in a four-way race. He led by 5% in a poll conducted two weeks ago.
  • Obama leads 52% to 46% among likely voters in Pew’s final national poll, conducted Thursday through Saturday. This is quite a drop from Pew’s poll conducted the previous week in which Obama led by 15% among likely voters (53% to 38%, implying that undecided voters have heavily broken towards the Republican). Obama leads by 11% among registered voters. 47% are sure they will not vote for McCain, while only 38% say the same about Obama.
  • Trackings: Obama gains 2% in Washington Post/ABC (54% to 43%), 1% in Zogby (50% to 44%). The margin is stable in Rasmussen (51% to 46%), in CBS News (54% to 41%) and Research 2000 (51% to 44%). Obama loses 1% in Gallup (52% to 43%, though he loses 2% in the LVT model for an 8% lead), 2% in Hotline (50% to 45%) and in IBD/TIPP (47% to 45%). Obama’s leads are thus: 2%, 5%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 9%, 11%, 13%.
  • Pennsylvania: Obama stops the bleeding in a Rasmussen poll taken Saturday, leading 52% to 46%; that’s up from the 4% he enjoyed in a Thursday poll but 1% down from a poll taken on Monday. Obama leads 52% to 45% in Morning Call’s tracking poll, his smallest lead since October 1st. Obama lead 51% to 44% in a SUSA poll conducted Thursday and Friday (he led by 12% two weeks ago).
  • Virginia: Obama leads 50% to 46% in a SUSA poll conducted Thursday and Friday, the tightest margin since mid-September. Obama led between 6% and 10% in the past four SUSA polls, though most of the change in this poll can be attributed to a much tighter partisan breakdown. Obama leads 47% to 44% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Wednesday and Thursday. Of the 9% who are undecided, 75% live outside of Northern Virginia and more than 90% are white. Obama led by 2% ten days ago.
  • Colorado: Obama leads 49% to 44% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday. Obama leads among independents by an impressive 25%.
  • Nevada: Obama leads 47% to 43% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday. That margin is just within the MoE.
  • Ohio: McCain leads 47% to 45% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday. He led by 1% two weeks ago. Obama leads 52% to 46% in a Columbus Dispatch poll that was conducted by mail and that should thus be taken with a huge grain of salt; it widely overstated Democratic support in 2006 though it has also had successes
  • North Carolina: McCain leads 49% to 46% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday; the candidates were tied two weeks ago.
  • Missouri: McCain 47% to 46% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday; McCain also led by 1% two weeks ago
  • Iowa: Obama leads 54% to 37% in Selzer & Co’s very reliable Des Moines Register poll conducted Tuesday through Thursday.
  • Minnesota: Obama leads 53% to 42% in a Star Tribune poll. He led by the same margin two weeks ago.
  • New Mexico: Obama leads 52% to 45% in a SUSA poll; Obama leads by 19% among the 60% of voters who say they have already voted.

Meanwhile, in down the ballot polls:

  • Kentucky, Senate race: The two pollsters that had found a dead heat in mid-October now find McConnell pulling ahead. SUSA, which had a tie at 48%, now shows McConnell leading 53% to 45%. Mason Dixon has McConnell gaining four points to grab a 5% lead, 47% to 42%.
  • Colorado, Senate race: Mark Udall leads 47% to 43% in a Mason Dixon poll of Colorado’s Senate race, though independents vote for Udall by a large 19%.
  • Minnesota, Senate race: Al Franken leads 42% to 38% in a Star Tribune poll, with 15% going to Barkley. Two weeks ago, Franken led 39% to 36% with 18% for Barkley.
  • In NM-01, an Albuquerque Journal poll conducted this week has Democratic candidate Martin Heinrich leading 47% to 43%.

Mason-Dixon’s Colorado’s poll is further confirmation of the pollster’s GOP lean, as all other pollsters have found a wide Udall lead over the past two weeks; I am not saying that having a GOP lean disqualifies Mason-Dixon (we won’t know whose turnout model is most appropriate until Tuesday), but this one particular margin is not supported by any recent poll. Their poll from Kentucky, however, finds the same findings as SUSA and Rasmussen have this week: Senator McConnell appears to have pulled away. Lunsford is well within striking distance, but with 2 days to go the trendlines favor the incumbent.

In New Mexico, both open races remain highly competitive. (NM-01 is rated lean Democratic in my latest ratings while NM-02 is a toss-up.) The high number of undecided voters in NM-02 leaves hope to Republicans, as that is a conservative district where Republicans could come home.


Poll watch: Dems still far from 60, and is NV in the same tier as CO and VA?

October 30, 2008

The presidential race remained remarkably stable. If the tracking polls showed McCain gaining slightly yesterday, they have Obama regaining some breathing room today; he is at 50% or above in 6 of the 9 national polls. McCain is once again stuck in the low 40s, with a margin ranging from 41% to 46%. Sure, the New York Times and Fox News national polls came out with differing results, but at least there is no mystery behind the discrepancy: the partisan breakdown has narrowed in the Fox poll.

McCain got one of his most promising polling results in days today as Mason Dixon found him trailing by only 4% in Pennsylvania - the tightest the state has been since a mid-September poll. We should not dismiss this poll, even though surveys taken over the same period show a larger advantage for Obama. Mason Dixon has been consistently releasing results that are better than average for McCain. The Republican nominee led in Virginia when other surveys found him trailing, and trailed only narrowly when other surveys found a large gap; the same was true in Florida and now Pennsylvania. The consistency of these narrower results suggests that it is due to Mason Dixon’s methodology and turnout models, which means that we should not throw these out as outliers: There is a turnout model out there employed by a respected pollster like Mason Dixon that yields results that are better for Republicans, and we won’t know until Tuesday whose assumptions were flawed.

All of this said, there is no discussion to be had that Obama retains an extremely strong position in the electoral college. For one, he remains ahead in the Big Three sates: 3 polls of Pennsylvania show him in the lead (though Mason Dixon has a 4% race), and he is also ahead in Colorado and Virginia. While two polls of Virginia show him with narrower leads than we have seen of late, both surveys were taken over the same period as the CNN and SUSA polls that had him leading by 9% - so these new polls are not picking any new tightening.

To make matters worse for McCain, we might now be getting a third competitive red state where an Obama pick-up appears increasingly likely: Nevada. After posting two double-digit leads earlier this week, Obama leads outside of the margin of error in two new surveys (Suffolk and CNN/Time). This is a very important development: Even if McCain were to save Virginia and Colorado, Obama would become president by winning Nevada alone; if McCain can somehow snatch Pennsylvania, an (not at all improbable) Obama sweep of Virginia, Colorado and Nevada would offset the loss of the Keystone State.

As if this was not enough, Ohio and North Carolina are slowly moving in Obama’s column as the Democrat is accumulating good results in both. Today, he leads in all five polls from these two states, and four of them have him ahead outside of the MoE. Given that a huge number of North Carolina voters have already voted, it is starting to get late for McCain to turn the tide. And while Obama is showing no sign of trembling in blue states (he has huge leads in Wisconsin and Minnesota), McCain is now locked in highly competitive races in a number of staunchly red states - including his home state of Arizona, South Dakota and Montana.

  • Obama leads 52% to 41% in a New York Times/CBS News poll, a very small tightening from Obama’s 13% lead last week. 51% say Obama is ready to be president, and McCain’s favorability has collapsed to 41% (!). So has voters’ estimate of whether Palin is able to deal the job (only 35% say so). Obama leads among men and women, and has a 17% advantage among independents.
  • Obama leads 47% to 44% in a Fox News national poll conducted over the past two days. Obama led by 9% last week, so the race has substantially tightened. The partisan ID has tightened from a 6% gap to a 2% gap (though this does not seem to be an arbitrary imposition like Zogby’s).
  • Tracking polls: Obama gains 2% in Zogby (50% to 43%) and in Rasmussen (51% to 46%). He gains 1% in IBD/TIPP (48% to 44%). The race is stable in Washington Post/ABC (52% to 44%), Gallup (51% to 44%, though Obama gains 2% in the LVT model, 50% to 45%). Obama loses 1% in Hotline (48% to 42%) and in Research 2000 (50% to 45%). Obama’s leads are thus: 4%, 5%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 7%, 8%.
  • Pennsylvania: Obama leads 47% to 43% in a Mason Dixon poll conducted Sunday and Monday. Obama leads 54% to 41% in Morning Call’s tracking, the highest percentage Obama has ever received in this poll. Obama leads 55% to 43% in a CNN/Time poll conducted Thursday through Tuesday (Obama leads by 15% among registered voters!).
  • Colorado: Obama leads 51% to 45% in a Marist poll (52% to 43% among registered voters) conducted Sunday and Monday; his lead comes entirely among the 44% of registered voters who say they have already voted. Obama leads by 23% among independents and has strongest party loyalty (leading me to question why he is only ahead by 6%). Obama leads 48% to 44% in a National Journal poll of registered voters with a small sample and a large MoE conducted Thursday through Monday; Obama leads by 22% among independents.
  • Virginia: Obama leads 51% to 47% in a Marist poll (by 6% among registered voters) conducted Sunday and Monday; McCain takes a 12% lead among independents. Obama leads 48% to 44% in a National Journal poll of registered voters with a small sample and a large MoE conducted Thursday through Monday. Both polls were taken over the same period as SUSA, Rasmussen and CNN poll showing larger Obama leads.
  • Nevada: Obama leads 50% to 45% in a RGJ/Research 2000 poll (he led by 7% earlier in October); McCain leads by 3% in crucial Washoe County, though the RGJ points out that (unreleased) private polls for both parties have Obama leading that county. Obama leads 52% to 45% in a CNN/Time poll conducted Thursday through Tuesday, an improvement over his 5% lead last week (he leads by 11% among registered voters!).
  • Ohio: Obama leads 48% to 41% in a National Journal poll of registered voters with a small sample and a large MoE conducted Thursday through Monday; Obama’s lead is outside of the MoE. Obama leads 51% to 47% in a CNN/Time poll conducted Thursday through Tuesday (Obama leads by 10% among registered voters!).
  • Florida: Obama leads 45% to 44% in a National Journal poll of registered voters with a small sample and a large MoE conducted Thursday through Monday.
  • North Carolina: Obama leads 50% to 48% in a Rasmussen poll taken yesterday (McCain led by 2% on Sunday). Obama leads 47% to 43% in a National Journal poll of registered voters with a small sample and a large MoE conducted Thursday through Monday. Obama leads 52% to 46% in a CNN/Time poll conducted Thursday through Tuesday (Obama led by 4% last week, he is ahead by 3% among registered voters).
  • Indiana: McCain leads 49% to 46% in a Rasmussen poll taken yesterday (he led by 7% three weeks ago). Obama leads 46% to 45% in a Selzer & Co poll conducted Sunday through Tuesday; he is ahead 2:1 among early voters and gets “only” 82% of African-Americans (remember Tuesday’s polling memo released by the McCain campaign?). The candidates are tied at 47% in a Research 2000 poll taken from Friday through Tuesday.
  • Wisconsin: Obama takes a giant 55% to 39% lead in a SUSA poll taken Tuesday and Wednesday, up from 8%. Obama leads by 28% among early voters.
  • Iowa: Obama leads 55% to 40% in a SUSA poll taken Tuesday and Wednesday.
  • South Dakota: McCain only leads 45% to 40% in an internal poll for Democratic Senator Johnson’s campaign.
  • Montana: McCain leads 50% to 46% in a Rasmussen poll. He led by four weeks ago.
  • Safe(r) states: McCain leads 61% to 36% in a SUSA poll of Alabama. McCain leads 58% to 37% in a SUSA poll of Kansas. Obama leads 56% to 39% in a SUSA poll of Massachusetts. Obama leads 55% to 33% in a Field poll of California. Obama leads 54% to 38% in a Research 2000 poll of New Jersey. McCain leads 53% to 42% in a NBC News poll and 52% to 44% in a SUSA poll of South Carolina (but only by 6% among registered voters). McCain leads 55% to 43% in a Rasmussen poll of Kentucky.

Meanwhile, in down the ballot polls:

  • Louisiana: Two polls have differing results. An internal poll for the Kennedy campaign has Mary Landrieu up 45% to 44%, while a Loyola University poll has Landrieu ahead 49% to 34%; the latter poll does not seem very reliable, however, as it only shows McCain leading by 3% and implying an oversampling of Democrats.
  • Mitch McConnell leads 51% to 44% in a Rasmussen poll of Kentucky’s Senate race. (McConnell led by the same margin last month.) A Lunsford internal has McConnell leading 47% to 45%, however.
  • Norm Coleman leads 42% to 36% in a Mason Dixon poll of Minnesota. Barkley is now at 12%, and he is hurting Franken: He draws 17% of Democrats and only 4% of Republicans - a hugely consequential disparity.
  • Safer seats: Tom Udall leads 56% to 41% in a Rasmussen poll of New Mexico. GOP Senator Pat Roberts leads 60% to 33% in a new SUSA poll of Kansas. Democratic Senator Lautenberg leads 56% to 39% in a Research 2000 poll of New Jersey. Sen. Cornyn leads 45% to 36% in a University of Texas poll, with 5% going to Libertarian candidate Adams-Schick. GOP candidate Jim Risch leads 45% to 33% in a Harstad poll of Idaho.
  • In MO-06, perhaps the most disappointing House race for Democrats, GOP Rep. Graves leads 54% to 36% in a SUSA poll. He led by 11% last month.
  • In KY-02, GOP candidate Brett Guthrie leads 53% to 43% in a new SUSA poll. Guthrie led by 9% last month but trailed over the summer.
  • In OR-05, Democratic candidate Kurt Schrader leads 55% to 33% in a SUSA poll.
  • In NY-26, Republican candidate Chris Lee has a large 48% to 34% lead against Alice Kryzan in a SUSA poll. He led by 11% last month.
  • In ID-01, Democratic challenger leads 48% to 41% in a Harstad poll, though the poll has a large MoE of 6%.
  • In PA-12, Rep. Murtha only leads 46% to 44% in a GOP poll conducted by Dane & Associates.
  • In Massachusetts’s question 1 to repeal the state income tax, the “no” is far ahead, 64% to 29% in a SUSA poll.

Democrats have their share of very good news in these wave of surveys - especially the two North Carolina polls showing a Hagan lead and the NV-02 survey confirming that Rep. Heller is in real danger - Republicans got uncommly positive numbers over the past 24 hours. In the Senate, Republicans appear to be solidifying their hold on the four Senate seats that are not yet leaning Democratic - KY, MN, MS and also GA because a runoff should help Chambliss. McConnell has not slipped further after his race fell into a competitive race in early October, and Coleman has improved his situation over the past three weeks.

Minnesota should be particularly worrisome to Democrats because Franken’s slippage is due to the fact that Barkley is starting to draw disproportionately from Franken’s base. If that is confirmed by other polls, it is hard to see Franken pull this off. This is a reminder that, however much progress Democrats have made over the past few weeks, the path to 60 still requires picking-up two out of these 4 seats - and that remains a tall order.

The latest House polls should also be a reminder that Democrats will certainly not win everything on Tuesday, and that a fair number of Republicans appear to be making progress in this hostile environment. The latest poll of MO-06 has to be crushing to Democrats as former Kansas City Mayor Barnes was once one of their top recruits. And while the DCCC is still investing in NY-26, the polls have not been very promising ever since Kryzan won the Democratic nomination.


Poll watch: Obama dominates VA, gains edge in OH, Merkley in strong position, Lampson drowns

October 27, 2008

In my latest presidential ratings this morning, I identified the three states to watch in the election’s final stretch: Virginia, Pennsylvania and Colorado. Eight days from the election, Obama holds strong in those crucial states: A grand total of five new Virginia polls were released today, finding a consistent Obama advantage. Only Rasmussen found Obama holding a lead smaller than 7%, the four others having Obama’s lead go as high as 11%. Only one poll each from Colorado and Pennsylvania were released: Obama was leading comfortably in Pennsylvania, though his margin in Colorado is smaller than Democrats are hoping to see (4%).

That said, there is some movement in McCain’s favor in the tracking polls, and I feel compelled to point that out because of what I said in yesterday’s poll watch, when remarking on McCain’s inability to break out of the low 40s: “The day McCain manages to inch above 45%, we can think about whether the race is tightening.” Today, McCain gets to 46% in one national poll and is at 45% in three more. But Obama remains in a dominant position, as he is at 50% or above in six of the seven tracking polls; only IBD/TIPP has him at a weaker position, and that tracking’s internals are rather strange (Obama enjoys stronger party loyalty and leads among independents but only leads by 3%).

In other states, Obama’s strong position is confirmed: New polls in Ohio and Florida find Obama holding an advantage, especially in the former state. In fact, Rasmussen’s polls from these two states should put to rest talk of a tightening since Obama gains 5% and 6% in the two surveys over those released last Monday.

McCain’s two best trendlines today come from PPP’s North Carolina survey (that had Obama up 7% last week, up 1% today) and SUSA and Rasmussen’s Missouri polls (Obama led by 8% and 5%, he now ties and is ahead by 1%), but the size of Obama’s lead in all three of these surveys was not confirmed by other polls, making this week’s surveys expected regressions to the mean. In fact, it is great for Obama is that the true toss-ups are not the states he needs to win but rather places like North Carolina or Missouri: six new polls in those two states find tight races. Even Arizona polls are now showing a competitive race!

  • Obama remains ahead in the day’s tracking polls, though there is some movement: Obama loses a significant three points in Research 2000 (50% to 42%, with a 5% lead in the Sunday sample) and Rasmussen (51% to 46%); he also loses 1% in IBD/TIPP (47% to 44%). Three trackings are stable: Washington Post/ABC (52% to 45%), Hotline (50% to 42%) and Zogby (50% to 45%). Obama inches up one point in Gallup (53% to 43%, the same margin as RVs and double his lead in the LVT model). That means that Obama’s leads are: 3%, 5%, 5%, 7%, 8%, 8% and 10%.
  • Virginia: Five new polls have Obama in the lead by margins ranging from 4% to 11%. The two most recent are Rasmussen and SUSA: Obama leads 52% to 43% in a SUSA poll, including a huge lead among early voters. His lead in Rasmussen is smaller: 51% to 47%, down from a 10% lead last week.
  • Obama leads 52% to 45% in a Zogby poll conducted over the week-end. Obama leads 52% to 44% in a Washington Post poll. (He led by 3% last month. This time, 50% of respondents say they have been personally contacted by the Obama campaign. The enthusiasm gap is huge, with 70% of Obama supporters describing themselves as enthusiastic.) Obama leads 51% to 40% in a VCU poll.
  • Ohio: Obama leads 50% to 45% in a Zogby poll, in which he has a 16% edge among independents. Obama leads 49% to 45% in Rasmussen, a 6% swing from last week.
  • Colorado: Obama leads 50% to 46% in Rasmussen, a 1% gain for McCain over last week.
  • Florida: The candidates are tied at 47% in a Zogby poll, though Obama has a strangely large 62-25 lead among independents. Obama leads 49% to 44% in a Suffolk poll of the state (up from 4%). Obama leads 51% to 47% in a Rasmussen poll, a 5% swing in his favor since last week.
  • Pennsylvania: Obama leads 50% to 41% in a Temple University poll. The survey was conducted over an entire week (from the 20th to the 26th), however.
  • Nevada: Obama leads 48% to 44% in a Zogby poll, barely outside of the margin of error.
  • North Carolina: Obama leads 50% to 46% in a Zogby poll. Obama leads 49% to 48% in a PPP poll, though he led by 7% last week. There are far less undecided voters this week. However, among early voters (about a third of the sample), Obama leads 63% to 36% (”looking at it another way, 49% of blacks in our survey said they had already voted. Only 29% of white voters said the same”). McCain leads 49% to 48% in Rasmussen, a 1% gain for Obama since late last week.
  • Iowa: Obama leads 52% to 42% in a Marist poll, the same margin he enjoyed last month.
  • New Hampshire: Obama leads 50% to 45% in a Marist poll, a one point decline since September.
  • Indiana: McCain leads 50% to 44% in a Zogby poll.
  • West Virginia: McCain leads 50% to 40% in a Zogby poll, thanks in part to 28% of Democratic voters.
  • Oregon: Obama leads 57% to 38% in a SUSA poll. Half of the electorate has already voted (remember that all of Oregon votes by mail), and Obama leads by 28% among those voters.
  • Arizona: The third poll in two days finds McCain in trouble in his home state. He leads 51% to 46% in a Rasmussen poll.

Meanwhile, in down-the-ballot polls:

  • Jeff Merkley leads 49% to 42% in a SUSA poll of Oregon’s Senate race. Half of the electorate has already voted, and Merkley leads by 10% among those voters.
  • Kay Hagan leads 48% to 45% in a PPP poll of North Carolina’s Senate race. She led by 8% last week.
  • Jay Nixon leads 55% to 38% in a SUSA poll of Missouri’s gubernatorial race.
  • In TX-22, Republican challenger Pete Olson leads Democratic Rep. Nick Lampson 53% to 36% in a new Zogby poll.
  • In FL-25, GOP Rep. Diaz-Balart leads 45% to 42% in a Research 2000 poll. Among early voters, Garcia leads 52% to 46%.
  • In SC-01, GOP Rep. Harry Brown leads 50% to 45% in a new SUSA poll.
  • In TX-07, GOP Rep. Culberson leads 47% to 40% in a Zogby poll.

Jeff Merkley’s numbers are the most important of this group, as this is the Oregon Democrat’s largest lead yet against Gordon Smith, who continues to be stuck in the low 40s. More importantly, SUSA’s polls confirms what was one of the main reasons I changed the ratings of the race to lean Democratic two days ago: Because of Oregon’s mail-in voting system, Election Day is happening right now in Oregon, giving Smith no time to catch up. While remaining ahead, Kay Hagan does not look to be as favored as her Oregon colleague.

A number of fascinating indepenent House polls were released as well, the most noteworthy of which is Zogby’s survey from TX-22: This was long seen as an extremely highly endangered Democatic seat, but the DCCC’s decision to dump hundreds of thousands of dollars suggested they saw Lampson with a chance at surviving. Zogby’s poll indicates that the conventional wisdom was right and that Lampson is an underdog in what is one of the most Republican seats represented by a Democrat. That said, the DCCC has just debuted a very hard-hitting ad on Pete Olsen, accusing him of voter fraud. We will see whether that moves any numbers.

As for CA-04, SC-01 and TX-07, all three are heavily Republican districts and for independent polls to find the Republican under 50% in each and the Democrat leading in one is obviously major news, and confirms that Democrats can expect to prevail in a few heavily conservative seats on November 4th.


Senate rating changes: Dems lead in 6 GOP-held seats, hope to sweep 11

October 25, 2008

As the GOP’s nightmare scenario continues to unfold, Democrats are making progress where it matters most, and four of the eleven seats Democrats have hope of picking-up today shift towards them: Virginia enters the safe take-over category, Colorado finally migrates up to the likely Democratic column (a move Democrats were hoping would happen a year ago), Oregon moves out of the toss-up column and Mississippi enters it. Oregon’s move means that six GOP-held seats are now considered to be at least leaning Democratic - though Gordon Smith and Elizabeth Dole are still highly competitive.

Tight Senate seats tend to break overwhelmingly in one direction on Election Day: Witness 2006, where Democrats nearly swept the toss-up races and 2002-2004, when Republicans did the same. And this is what puts Republicans in a precarious position: In addition to these now six Dem-leaning seats, three are rated toss-ups (Alaska, Minnesota and Mississippi) and two (Kentucky and Georgia) are barely hanging on as lean Republican.

If the political winds continues to push Democratic candidates in the next 10 days, Democrats could very well pull a near-sweep of these five races, scoring nine to eleven pick-ups. Even if the GOP manages to stop the bleeding, it is difficult to see how they can avoid losing at least five seats.

However, two outside factors could save Republicans from a Democratic sweep and allow them to salvage Alaska and Georgia’s race even if November 4th turns out to be a blue tsunami. First, of course, is the Ted Stevens trial. If the jury acquits Stevens, the Alaska Senate race would move to the lean Republican column. If the decision has not come by November 4th (as the deliberations keep being delayed), all bets are off.

Second, a blue wave would not only have to carry Jim Martin ahead of Saxby Chambliss for him to score a victory on November 4th, it would also have to get him across 50%. If neither candidate crosses that threshold (and that is very much possible given the candidacy of Libertarian candidate Allen Buckley), a runoff will be held on December 2nd. Such a runoff would seem to favor Sen. Chambliss. For one, Barack Obama would no longer be at the top of the ticket, which would make a boost in black turnout unlikely (African-Americans make up 35,4% of early voters for now, far higher than in 2004). Second, voters might not be looking to punish Republicans anymore by December 2nd, especially if Obama wins the presidency and if Democrats have already secured a big Senate majority. That would make it far easier for the GOP to argue that keeping Chambliss is necessary to not give Democrats too large a majority.

Virginia, likely take-over to safe take-over: Barack Obama is leading the state’s presidential race by double-digits in the latest polls, so what is the chance that Mark Warner stumbles? Jim Gilmore’s campaign has been a catastrophe from the start, and the state GOP will regret having barred Tom Davis’s path to the nomination.

Colorado, lean take-over to likely take-over: In what has been one of the most puzzling races of this cycle, nothing that either candidate did was moving poll numbers. Mark Udall remained consistently ahead by single-digits for more than a year despite expectations that he would be able to rapidly pull away. Even the revelations about Bob Schaffer’s connection to Jack Abramoff and the abortion and sweat-shop labor controversies that surrounded his trip to the Mariana Islands failed to significantly help Udall. Similarly, the GOP thought they were making progress when the public mood turned in favor of oil drilling; Republicans believed that would hurt Udall, who is a staunch conservationist, and even Udall must have thought the same thing since he abruptly reversed his stance on drilling in the late summer. Yet, Udall’s defensive summer position made no dent in his modest polling lead.

Over the past month, however, the race appears to have decisively broken in Udall’s favor. The economic crisis has hurt Republicans across the country, and nowhere more so than in open seats. In a supreme sign of confidence, the DSCC announced this week that it was pulling out of the state, no longer believing that Udall needed their help. The NRSC did the same yesterday, pulling its ads out and shifting the resources it had devoted to helping Schaffer to other more salvageable seats. While Colorado might not be as much of a lock as New Mexico and Virginia, it has become highly unlikely that Schaffer can pull off an upset.

Oregon, toss-up to lean take-over: Sen. Gordon Smith has been aware that he is vulnerable since the first days of the cycle and has done his best to prepare, but the environment is simply too toxic for Republicans - particularly in a blue state like Oregon. All polls suggest that Obama will crush McCain in the state, significantly outperforming Al Gore and John Kerry, a clear sign that Oregon’s independent voters are behaving like Democrats. The DSCC has been hammering Gordon Smith for months for his proximity to George Bush and for his party label, and it is remarkable that all of Smith’s ads touting his bipartisanship (some of which were quite effective) have not protected him. As if that was not enough, the Democratic surge of the past six weeks has perhaps damaged no Republican as much as Gordon Smith.

Merkley has now inched ahead in the latest polls and, while Merkley’s advantage remains narrow, Smith is stuck in the low 40s - very dangerous territory for an incumbent. That Merkley looks to be slightly ahead now is particularly significant because… Election Day is happening right now in Oregon. All voting is conducted via mail in Oregon, and the ballots arrived at voters’ home this week; these ballots have to be returned (not postmarked, returned) by November 4th, which means that most of the electorate will have voted by the middle of the next week. (As of Thursday, the ballots of 13% of registered voters had already arrived, with many more probably on the way.) All of this means that Smith has far less time than other endangered Republicans to try and turn the tide, and he will not benefit from any last-minute GOP surge.

All of this said, Smith is by no means out of the game, and this rating change is merely meant to reflect that Merkley now has a slight advantage. In particular, this is a race in which the GOP’s argument against unified government could resonate, and the liberal-leaning Oregonian endorsed Smith last week, warning against the possibility of a 60-seat Democratic Senate. That said, Smith is here plagued by the same problem we talked about above: Republicans have not yet started to make fear of a unified government the center of their congressional campaign, and even if they do that in the coming days, it might be too late in Oregon where many voters will have already cast their ballot.

Mississippi, lean retention to toss-up: Republicans felt much better about this state in the first half of September. Sarah Palin’s selection had invigorated the conservative base, and the post-convention GOP surge looked like it would be to put away races in very Republican areas. But things have shifted quite dramatically since my last rankings, and Ronnie Musgrove has gained as the conversation has turned to the economy. Research 2000 and Rasmussen have both showed him closing the gap Sen. Wicker had opened during the summer.

But there is another factor that has led me to move this race to a more competitive category: We have always known that Musgrove’s fortunes were tied to the level of black turnout, as race is the best predictor of the vote in Mississippi (Kerry got 14% of the white vote in 2004). Would Barack Obama’s presence at the top of the ticket boost African-American turnout? While we don’t have a response to that question in Mississippi, the early voting data that is being reported out of North Carolina and Georgia suggest that African-Americans are very motivated and that they might very well make up a far greater proportion of the electorate as they did in 2004. If that pattern holds in Mississippi, it could push Musgrove over the top.

This campaign has been particularly vicious, with both sides and the national committees exchanging brutal spots, with Democrats going after Wicker on economic issues (his votes against the minimum wage, for instance) and the GOP attacking Musgrove’s gubernatorial record. The Republican attacks have been more personal, as a subtext of the anti-Musgrove campaign has been the Democrat’s divorce as well as his efforts to change the Confederate-inspired state flag while he was governor; the GOP is also airing a gay-baiting ad tying Musgrove to the “homosexual agenda.”

Kansas, likely retention to safe retention: Democrats had some hope that former Rep. Slattery could make this a race, and some summer polls showing Republican Sen. Roberts under 50% gave them hope; even the Kansas press started noticing that there was a Senate race worth covering. But a wave of advertisement has allowed Roberts to regain his footing, despite a memorable ad by Slattery, and the incumbent is now leading by huge margins in the latest polls.

Texas, likely retention to safe retention: Late spring, Sen. Cornyn looked even more endangered than his neighbor from Kansas, as a string of polls showed him barely ahead of Democratic challenger Rick Noriega, a state Senator who might not have been a top-tier candidate but was certainly credible enough to exploit Cornyn’s vulnerabilities. Unfortunately for Democrats, Noriega never caught fire, and Cornyn’s poll numbers - while not as stellar as they could be - put him safely ahead. The main factor that explains why Texas did not become more competitive while North Carolina, Kentucky and Georgia have joined the top-tier is money: It takes a lot of it to wage a campaign in the Lone Star State because of the high number of media markets one has to cover - many of which are very expensive. Noriega’s fundraising was not strong enough to get around that problem, and this also prevented the DSCC from moving in.

South Dakota, likely retention to safe retention: The race was kept in the potentially competitive category based on the possibility that Sen. Johnson’s health condition worsened and gave an opening to his Republican opponent, but Johnson has managed to coast his way to the election remarkably smoothly. South Dakota was once considered as one of the most competitive races of the cycle, but there has been nothing to see ever since Johnson announced he would run for re-election.

Full ratings and rankings are available here.


Congress: The violent Stevens juror, Boulder liberals, and connecting rabbis to terrorists

October 23, 2008

In yet another twist in the Ted Stevens trial, the jury sent the judge a note… asking for the removal of one of its members. The note, written by the foreman, explained that, “she is being rude, disrespectful and unreasonable. She has had violent outbursts with other jurors and that’s not helping anyone. The jurors are getting off-course. She’s not following the laws and rules that are being stipulated to in the main instructions.” Judge Sullivan convoked the jury and asked to be courteous towards one another, so no juror has been removed for now, and the jury is back to deliberating over Stevens’ legal - and electoral - fate.

If this juror’s hostility is based on disagreement over the facts of the case, it could mean that the jury is having trouble reaching a decision - a good sign for the defense. If it is due to the juror’s natural propensity to be “rude, disrespectful and unreasonable,” well, it might not mean anything at all. For now, the consequence of all of this is to delay a verdict and with it any sense of resolution in what is the biggest outstanding question that will be answered before Election Day. (That said, it is highly unlikely that the jury is unable to reach a decision by November 3th, so it’s unlikely that voters will go to the polls before knowing the verdict.)

Meanwhile, the volume of ads in some of the most heated congressional races is being dialed up. In Colorado, Republicans are getting desperate in their attempts to destabilize Mark Udall, who has led in ever single poll taken this year. While third party groups have poured millions in the race and the GOP has invested a lot of efforts in painting Udall as too far to the left, numbers have barely moved for months now, so the NRSC’s latest ad literally goes all-out on the font size department, proclaiming to all viewers that Udall is a “Boulder liberal” who marches in lockstep with his party:

You decide whether such an ad has a chance of being effective. It doesn’t introduce a new argument, simply recycles attacks that have been running (unsuccessfuly) for months and illustrates them more directly. In Kentucky, it is Democrats who are upping their attacks, though they are doing so on a topic that has proved effective over the past few weeks. Mitch McConnell’s decline in the polls can be directly related to the economic crisis, and the DSCC’s new ad accuses the incumbent Senator of being responsible for the state’s losing jobs. The spot details the number of jobs particular counties lost to different countries:

Mitch McConnell is also being targeted by a 527, Campaign Money Watch. The group is spending $380,000 on an ad accusing the incumbent of using his clout to help pharmaceutical and insurance interests. All of these expenditures are taking place in the midst of heightening tensions between the two campaigns. Republicans are charging that Lunsford stole and erased recordings out of a McConnell digital recorder during a debate, and they are considering filing a lawsuit against the Democratic candidate himself.

The prize for the day’s most outrageous ad goes to GOP Rep. Scott Garrett of NJ-05, who occupies what is still considered as a relatively safe seat. But his opponent, Dennis Shulman, is credible enough that the race merits attention. Shulman is a blind rabbi but that is not preventing Garrett of running a jaw-dropping ad that accuses Shulman of wanting to “negotiate with terrorists” while Shulman’s face is juxtaposed with Ahmadinejad’s:

The DCCC has not spent any money on this district; given how many seats they are spending in, that suggests that Rep. Garrett is not that vulnerable, which makes his decision to go so negative rather surprising. This gives an opening for Shulman to get some media attention, after all. But Republican congressional candidates are not being particularly careful about what they are saying these days, which is surely giving NRCC officials huge headaches.

While it has not reached the level of Bachmann’s anti-Americanism rant, a recent statement by Rep. Hayes of NC-08 (”Liberals hate real Americans that work and accomplish and achieve and believe in God”) has attracted significant attention in the local media and has forced Hayes on the defensive. (NC-08 is rated a toss-up in my most recent ratings.) Hayes made the problem worse when his campaign denied it made the comments, then acknowledged them after an audio recording surfaced, and then Hayes denied that the comments had been denied! Of course, Democrats have their own problem with incumbents shooting themselves in the foot, as Rep. Murtha (PA-12)’s comments about his district’s racism and his later correction that they were rednecks has suddenly put that race on our radar screen.


Spending, spending, spending (and some cutbacks)

October 22, 2008

It might be very little compared to a $700 billion bailout, but it’s a lot of money but most other standards: Every presidential, congressional and gubernatorial campaign saved its ammunition for these final two weeks, and money is now flying left and right.

In this game of piling expenditures, woe to whoever is left behind! Or should some cutbacks perhaps be taken as good news by candidates? The Denver Post reveals tonight that the DSCC will pull-out of the Colorado Senate ra