For months, the GOP has been crowing about the gains it expects to make in the 2010 midterms. Boosted by the projections of non-partisan analysts, Republicans insist they should pick-up as many as 20 seats. Yet, they are now in very clear danger of losing a seat themselves: NY-23’s special election, which over the summer looked like it would be a long shot for Demorats who had no bench to speak of, is turning into a nigthmare for the Republican Party.
In many ways, Dede Scozzafava’s woes are the prolongation of the trainwreck that has become New York’s Republican Party. Over the past few years, they have sabatogated their own prospects in countless of races - whether Rep. Sweeney’s scandal in 2006, Rep. Fossella’s forced retirement and the ensing spectacle in 2008 or Assemblyman Tedisco’s flawed campaign in 2009. Now, it’s the intra-right war Scozzafava and Conservative Party nominee Doug Hoffman that is damaging GOP prospects, ruining the party’s chances of taking advantage of the national environment to score a decisive victory.
This is all the more tragic for Republicans because a Democratic victory in NY-23 would make it very tough for the GOP to point to New Jersey and Virginia’s governorships (assuming they pick-up both) as a harbinger of a coming red wave.
A new Siena poll confirms the narrative of an NRCC nightmare
According to Siena, what two weeks ago was a 7% lead for Scozzafava has swung to a 4% lead for Owens: The Democratic nominee gets 33%, with 29% for Scozzafava and 23% for Hoffman. 15% are undecided. This is now legitimately a 3-way race: three candidates are all within 10%. In a contest that is sure to be decided by low turnout, that means that we could get just about any result on November 3rd. But there is no question that Owens’s prospects are looking increasingly good.
Scozzafava and Hoffman are neutralize each other (over the past 2 weeks, Hoffman rised by 7% and Scozzafava fell by 6%), and there is nothing to suggest the conservative candidate will fade away: 63% of voters still don’t know him, so he still has plenty of room to grow. NY-23 is a swing district, so it’s not like there are so many GOP-leaning voters that the Republicans can afford splitting their vote.
As such, Owens is now in a position to win based on the support of his party’s base alone: In this poll, he only receives 55% of the Democratic vote, so he has room to rise above 33% as he continues to cover the airwaves with his ads. That makes him the front-runner: As long as neither Hoffman nor Scozzafava collapse (allowing the other to become the GOP’s de facto sole nominee) Owens won’t need much more than his current level of support to clinch victory. And of these 3 candidates, Owens is the least likely to lose backers: There is no one trying to take the Democratic base away from him and Owens has enough money to stay in voters’ minds - far more than Scozzafava does.
What is bound to depress Republicans is that the poll is a testament to how favored they would have been had this been a two-way race: Hoffman and Scozzafava together are receiving 52% of the vote. That makes it hard to see how Owens would have been competitive had he only faced Scozzafava.
What might be the reasons of the woes of Scozzafava’s camp?
The first reason that explains Owens and Hoffman’s progression is a shocking report courtesy of Politico: Despite the fact that she is the only politically experienced candidate, Scozzafava has no money to mount a strong campaign effort in the election’s closing weeks. She is being outspent by both her rivals - including by a 12-1 ratio relatively against Owens. For now, she has only been able to spend $26,000 on TV ads, whereas Owens has spent $303,000 and Hoffman has spent $124,000.
This is all the more terrible for Scozzafava because she is the one who is being hammered by both of her opponents - not to mention by the DCCC. It’s not like Owens or Hoffman are paying much attention to each other: (At the moment, Owens does not mind Hoffman’s rise while Hoffman is too busy taking Scozzafava down to worry about the Democrat.) With Scozzafava unable to counter the barrage of ads attacking her, the main reason she is still standing is that she started with a solid advantage in name recognition.
Of course, that factor should not be understated: Scozzafava is in trouble, she is financially uncompetitive - but she is also by far the most experienced candidate in the race. She is well-known in at least one part of the district, she will appear on the Independeent Party’s ballot line and her years as an Assemblywoman make her a credible enough candidate (relatively to her rivals’ lack of a public record) that she seems protected from a full-blown collapse that would leave her a distant third.
But at the moment, she has to find a way to lift herself up while simultaneously beating back two opponents - ensuring she does not lose more moderates to Owens while not letting Hoffman become the de facto GOP nominee. That’s a tough exercise.
The second factor that’s fueling Republican pessimism is that the Democratic base looks more willing to embrace Owens than a few months ago, when union groups were signaling they wouldn’t pay much attention to this race because of the contest’s ideological confusion. Yet, the Working Families Party announced last week it would endorse Owens. That not only means that the Democratic nominee will appear on the WFP’s ballot line, but it also means that he will benefit from their organizational muscle; sure, this is not New York City, but the WFP’s turnout machine should be a big boost to Owens.
Don’t forget that this endorsement was not obvious: The WFP had endorsed Scozzafava in some of her past races. There is little doubt that Scozzafava’s need to watch her right flank prevented her from seeking the WFP’s nod as actively as she might have otherwise. Given Owens’s position on issues like the public option, that might have been enough to at least get the party to sit this one out.
The best news Scozzafava recently received was an endorsement by the NRA, which might just have easily have gone for Hoffman. But what is good for Scozzafava is not necessarily bad for Democrats: the Republican universe is confirming its split between the two contenders that are claiming the GOP mantle. Even Mike Huckabee might be preparing to join in the fun: He is scheduled to speak at a Conservative Party state meeting in the coming weeks.


Interesting analysis. It does seem the Democrat could win as he can afford plenty of ads and they can be positive ads that remind the Democrats in the district that he is their party candidate and therefore win with 40% of the vote.
Interesting also is the suggestion that the GOP is aiming to win a net 20 seats next year. As such the Democrats would still have the majority. No-one is seriously thinking the Dems lose their senate majority so the voters for the third successive cycle give congress to the Dems. Hardly the sign of a massive backlash - I await Cliff’s comments!
I predict whomever wins this race will be primaried on either side.
And Guy, the right-of-the-D candidates will win AT LEAST 55% of the vote in this district. Hands down. It won’t be close.
But yes, the D’s will win this one. And they deserve to. The clusterf*&k that the local parties have created here is of their own doing and they deserve to lose.
The NY GOP will not let anybody primary Scozzafava, that is just how they operate. I don’t think its relavent though, as Scozzafava will finish 2nd or 3rd in this race. The mistake for the Republicans is that they nominated somebody that is nowhere close to being acceptable. The 2nd amendment is the only issue where she aligns with the GOP.
The GOP should hope that Owens or Hoffman wins this race. Owens can be beat as an incumbent but if Scozzafava wins she will be entrenched and just piss them off for her entire career.
Cliff,
I don’t think primary would be likely against Owens for the simple reason that there aren’t any viable Democrats in this district: Aubertine was the party’s only bench, and he won’t run in 2010 if he didn’t run for the special election.
Also, Preston don’t forget that the possibility that NY-23 will essentially be eliminated in the next round of redistricting is relatively high; that’s the case whoever wins next month (Owens will be more junior than other state Democrats), but especially if Scozzafava wins.
Cliff - you may be right that the non Democratic candidates get 55%. This would hardly be a shock since the district was represented by a Republican. If that is a great victory then I suppose you have to take what you can.
Also I apologise as this makes the comment very long but Cliff in an earlier post questioned my politics so I wanted to explain a little more to help with understanding :
I would consider myself a moderate Democrat and certainly don’t agree with everything the Dems do. However you as a Republican can hardly be pleased with where the GOP is at present. They have a core support which is characterized (rightly or wrongly is irrelevant if it is the perception) as being led by loud, obnoxious and rude people (Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh etc). The GOP do not seem to have policies on many issues that Americans care about – for example McCain made very little mention of anything to do with healthcare, education the environment. What seems to excite the GOP base is military, foreign and social policy but that seems to be about it. For an economic policy the GOP seems to resort to tax cuts and more tax cuts. With no apparent thought as to which cuts are best or whether a more sophisticated policy is required. Maybe this is why moderate GOP senators are a dying breed over the past 20 years (Chafee, Jeffords).
Regarding the Stimulus bill approved earlier this year, you asked if I supported it. Yes I do and I think the administration has done a bad job of selling it. Lets look at the facts –
33% of the package went in income tax reductions for 95% of working Americans (I would have thought the GOP would approve of that)
16% went to the states to help them balance their budgets. This directly reduced the number of job losses. It saved teachers, policeman and other valuable public sector workers.
Of course there will be issues with some of the spending – when you spend $787 billion over 2 years you will get some waste. It shouldn`t happen but that doesn`t mean you do not act.
I’m a “big tent” sort of guy. Honesty, Lindsey Graham is probably the Senator that represents my points of view best.
But here is why we are losing in NY-23
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/10/scozzafava_to_switch_parties.asp
I don’t want someone who doesn’t know what party they will belong to in a year.
Oh, and I don’t feel like getting in a long discussion of ideology with you right now, but neither Chafee nor Jeffords were moderates, Jeffords especially, was merely a liberal with an R next to their name.
Oh, and I, begrugingly, favored Specter in ‘04 against Toomey and would again under similar circumstances, even knowing what I know now.
Cliff - I assumed you were a big tent sort of Republican rather than the narrow ones in the ascendency now.
Jeffords and Chafee are just two of many. Chrstine Todd-Whitman would be another example of Republicans who have been driven from the party. Republicans used to be socially liberal and economically liberal. Clinton Democrats took that position over and were popular because of it.