Once again, the political world is buzzing about Sarah Palin. 10 months after John McCain’s ushered her on the national stage, the ambitious Alaska Governor abruptly exited the one elected office she’s ever held over a jurisdiction of more than 6,000 inhabitants.
As was the case for much of the 2008 election, Palin remains an enigma. Her persona, her politics and her rhetoric could hardly be more predictable; but how can we not be continuously stunned by her ability to gather huge and adoring crowds, by her willingness to make unconventional decisions, by the sincerity of her disregard for the value of truth and by her apparent conviction that making Bush look like a policy wonk is an asset?
Palin’s latest move is jaw-dropping not only because no one saw it coming but because she offered no clear explanation for resigning. She gave the impression that she simply woke up one morning and decided she had had enough, which raises obvious questions about her reliability and about how seriously she was taking her job.
I have been trying to think of any other politician who similarly walked away from an office for no clearly stated reason. The only person I can think of who comes remotely close is former Senator Trent Lott, who outrageously quit his Senate position a year before his term was up in order to take a lobbying job just before a new ethics law restricting the options of former legislators was to come into effect. [Correction: A commenter rightly corrects me and points out that Lott resigned a year into his term - which in my opinion only makes it worse.] Given that Palin’s resignation might also have been motivated by the quest of financial profit, pointing to Lott’s precedent will not help her look any less bizarre.
Of course, the Governor didn’t even explain her decision as much as Lott had. Her decision looks so irrational that it is beyond defense, beyond justification. Sure, government would be better if politicians were more willing to resign, but that doesn’t make it okay to abandon your responsibilities without any change in circumstances.
Palin looks to be just as confused than we are. Her rambling statement made Mark Sanford’s press conference look like model of coherence. She mentioned her family and the financial costs of responding to ethical inquiries. She explained that she did not want to be one of those lame-duck governors who stays in office despite announcing a retirement, which is apparently a symptom of conventional thinking (if every term-limited governor resigned a few months into a second term, imagine how much chaos there would be) but insisted that she wants to keep fighting for her causes.
(I do hope that Palin’s defenders will stop referring to her desire to be with her family, however. After the 2008 campaign in which her entourage expressed outrage that anyone would question that a woman can occupy public office while having young children, it would be quite a setback for future female candidates if Palin used an inability to balance these commitments as an excuse for quitting the governorship.)
Thus, my initial take was probably flawed because I started off assuming that the Governor had some plan. Most of my analysis concerned her resignation’s consequences on an eventual presidential bid but I am now willing to believe that no such bid is in the works. In fact, I don’t think anything is in the works. Palin decided that she was fed up with the governorship, posited that she’ll have an easier time doing the things she loves away from Juneau and she walked away.
As such, it is useless to try and read the Palin tea leaves: It’s unlikely the Governor has made any final decision about anything - let alone about 2012. Andrea Mitchell has been reporting that Palin is through with politics and that “she has told some of her biggest backers in the national Republican party that they are free to chose other candidates for 2012;” other journalists are not drawing similar conclusions. In short, I find it just as likely that we’ll soon see Palin in Iowa than that this press conference was her last major political appearance!
On the other hand, it’s difficult to imagine this woman, who looked so eager not only to gain further power but also to take on the liberal forces and the cultural elites that she thinks are ruining the country, suddenly sitting on the sidelines. She could find a compromise path between outright retirement and elected politics, one that would allow her to draw on the devotion of the conservative base without having to put up with “frivolous” ethical charges like those her rival dare bring up.
She has many other options in front of her. She could reinvent herself as a perpetual Republican star, a permanent ex-politician like Rudy Giuliani and Newt Gingrich; in this regard, her status as a former vice-presidential nominee and her popularity among the party’s base would outweigh her meager record. She could also become a media professional - take a job at Fox News, follow Rush Limbaugh or Joe Scarborough’s footsteps - or on the commentary circuit, like Ann Coulter.
I expect it to take years for Palin to decide whether she will pursue a presidential bid, whether she wants to distance herself from the public stage and whether she wants to try out another path. If she chooses the former option, she seriously damaged her viability after yesterday’s development and I can’t imagine how she’ll overcome the stain of her resignation. But she keeps enough of a following that she could make other options work out far better.
Palin’s decision matters in Alaska, too
While most of my analysis has been devoted to the national consequences of Palin’s move, it obviously shakes up Alaska. Just a year ago, before she was tapped as McCain’s running mate, the Governor looked to be taking a firm hold of her state’s GOP against her inner-party rivals. Now, her departure will elevate LG Sean Parnell as Governor and make the 2010 cycle that much more interesting.
Two politician who’s likely delighted by Palin’s decision are Parnell and Rep. Don Young, the ethically embattled congressman who barely survived a primary challenge by Parnell last year; a rematch might have been in the work in 2010, but Young can now breath easier since Parnell will run for re-election next year. As for Parnell, he’ll obviously have an easier time running for Governor: Had Palin retired, this staunch conservative would have faced a potentially tricky open gubernatorial race but he will now have the upper-hand in what should still be a contested primary.
As for Democrats, they will no doubt have a harder time contesting the seat than if it had been an open race, but it’s not like they’re giving up that much: state Sen Hollis French, former Commissioner of Administration Bob Poe and Ethan Berkowitz could all make credible candidates, but the past three cycles (Murkowski against Knowles, Palin versus Knowles, Stevens versus Begich, Young versus Berkowitz) demonstrated that Alaska is one of the country’s most reliably Republican states.
I think that Palin is doing everything she can to validate Andrew Sullivan and Todd Purdum’s theories about her mental state. No way a sane person, however dumb, has such an eratic and bizzare behavior.
I believe it is more apropriate for a psychologist to try to decipher her actions than a political analyst.
Taniel - you nailed it. She has no plan, she probably just is very impulsive (as shown by the Schmidt emails regarding the Alaska Independence Party and her going after Levi). She will continue to make news periodically but her influence will wane as the GOP focuses on 2012 and the main contenders fight it out.
I tried to watch the video of her resignation, but after a couple of minutes of a barely comprehensible stream of consciousness, I gave up. Now I realize why it took Palin six colleges and five years to get a four-year degree.
Might this be part of a deal to trade jobs with Senator Murkowski? If I recall correctly, Palin ruled out running against Murkowski, not running for the Senate in 2010. I’m pretty sure that Parnell would be a non-factor in a primary against Murkowski. This scenario could be enough to convince Hollis French to run for the Senate, as Palin’s resignation will undoubtedly anger many Alaskans, and beating Palin would be easier than beating Murkowski.
Far-fetched, but with her, who knows?
I think the sensible move for Palin at this point would be to become some sort of conservative power broker/queen-maker, possibly within the Republican machinery or perhaps as an allied commentator, such as Rush Limbaugh or Ann Coulter. She certainly has a large, devoted following among the base.
It is not clear if she realizes that a run for higher office is a complete non-starter, especially after her latest move.
Ogre - a reasonable idea (so as such she will not do it!). But I do think the “base” of the GOP are not as influential as people generally think. They did not like McCain yet he got the nomination. Romney was not liked by most evangelicals but upto 33% of them voted for him in a head to head with Huckabee. The real power base is the fiscal conservatives - they provide the money, they have the influential media elite (Wills, Rove, etc) and they will not allow someone they disagree with. That is why Huckabee has little chance because he is an economic populist. Palin my sell out to them but I think they would be embarrassed by her anti-intellectualism.
I have to say I agree with David, in that I also watched the video of her resignation but it was all just a little too much.
The fact that she could take the media turn and end up with Fox News or similar is a difficult concept to follow.
I would also say that there is not as much forethought into the decision as everyone is claiming and it will be interesting to see the flow on effects but I don’t think there will be that much of an impressive impact anywhere. But who knows I could of course be talking through a hole in my head. I never guessed she would resign so there you go what do I know!
Rgds
Adirec
Maybe one of the reasons Palin left is because she realizes that she is now damaged goods and will have a hard time getting elected president(to say the least), so she is trying to become an activist and/or party insider. Maybe she sees an opportunity to become a Republican power broker through the use of her dedicated following, even if she can’t get actual politcal power.
Some of your facts on Trent Lott are wrong. He ran for re-election in 2006 and won before resigning and leaving office in December 2007. Remember the Senate race last year between Roger Wicker and Ronnie Musgrove to fill out the final four years of his term. The rest of it is true. He left to avoid the new ethics rules that placed a longer cooling off period for former Senators to lobby their former colleagues. He now heads a shop with former Louisiana Senator John Breaux.
With every governor across the country struggling horribly in this recession, why bother with the hard business of governing when you can just hit the lecture circuit and earn $40,000 a pop? The temptation must have been overwhelming.
I predict Palin will come out of this a winner financially, but a loser politically. She has ruined her career in public office. But if she is laughing her way to the bank she may not care.
The governor clearly had a cognitive problem on the day of her resignation. Incoherent at times would be a more apt than rambling. The lady was clearly covering her reasons up and did not what to be held accountable for any particular reason. Her manor could be best described as withdrawn with her episode of wanting to avoid a large GOP social function. I won’t draw any conclusions but peculiar and strange would be defining adjectives.
I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.
I was suggested this website by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my problem. You’re incredible! Thanks!
Sources like the one you mentioned here might be very useful to me! I will submit a link to this web page on my blog. I am positive my visitors will discover that very useful.
According to O*Net Online, employment of Video Game Designers is expected to increase by 13% between 2008-2018, about as fast as the average for all occupations. They also report that the median annual wage for video game designers for 2010 is $79,240.* Find a degree program and bring your ideas to life in a video game. http://videogamedesigndegree.net Learn to Design Video Games with a Game Design Degree Today
It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this brilliant blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!
Great website you have here but I was curious if you knew of any community forums that cover the same topics discussed here? I’d really like to be a part of online community where I can get feed-back from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Thank you!
keep up the good work!