<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll watch: Strong numbers for Patty Murray, Mike Bloomberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/02/21/murray-bloomberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/02/21/murray-bloomberg/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: randydutton</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/02/21/murray-bloomberg/comment-page-1/#comment-39160</link>
		<dc:creator>randydutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=6317#comment-39160</guid>
		<description>There are several fiscal conservative candidates challenging Murray as of now.  Dr. Sean Salazar; Craig Williams (nuclear engineer); likely NFL Pro Clint Didier; and others.

Murray may have lots of trial lawyer and lobbyist money but she doesn't talk with her constituents.  She refused to hold townhall meetings.  She sends out unrelated form letter responses.  She rubber stamps the Obama appointments. She doesn't have an independent bone in her body.  She strongly supports unrestricted partial birth abortion. She supports gun control (NRA gives her an "F").  She may have the union bosses in her pocket but people who want the best education want education choice.  Most of us don't want government run healthcare.  Murray prevents America from tapping its $40 Trillion in oil assets (which could create hundreds of thousands of union jobs, and help balance the budget, and make our foreign policy easier).

Murray has proven to be in over her head even with years of experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several fiscal conservative candidates challenging Murray as of now.  Dr. Sean Salazar; Craig Williams (nuclear engineer); likely NFL Pro Clint Didier; and others.</p>
<p>Murray may have lots of trial lawyer and lobbyist money but she doesn&#8217;t talk with her constituents.  She refused to hold townhall meetings.  She sends out unrelated form letter responses.  She rubber stamps the Obama appointments. She doesn&#8217;t have an independent bone in her body.  She strongly supports unrestricted partial birth abortion. She supports gun control (NRA gives her an &#8220;F&#8221;).  She may have the union bosses in her pocket but people who want the best education want education choice.  Most of us don&#8217;t want government run healthcare.  Murray prevents America from tapping its $40 Trillion in oil assets (which could create hundreds of thousands of union jobs, and help balance the budget, and make our foreign policy easier).</p>
<p>Murray has proven to be in over her head even with years of experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/02/21/murray-bloomberg/comment-page-1/#comment-33972</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=6317#comment-33972</guid>
		<description>Patty Murray is the dumbest member of the Senate by a longshot.  And she'll be re-elected in a landslide.  

I lived in Washington for 24 years and Washington just loves her.   I don't know WHY Washington loves her, but they do.  The State GOP keeps throwing candidates at her that look good on paper, and they all get crushed. 

Cantwell, I can understand.  I vote against her, I'm a Republican, but she's reasonably intelligent, hardworking and pragmatic.  She's capable at least.

Murray, on the other hand, seems to see the Government as nothing more then a giant ATM machine which she hits up for her favorite programs.  She doesn't seem to understand much beyond that.  Yet she just does her "Mom in tennis shoes" schtick, and she wins big nomatter what. 

:sigh: ah well.  While she's stupid, at least she's not vicious and rude like Barbara Boxer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patty Murray is the dumbest member of the Senate by a longshot.  And she&#8217;ll be re-elected in a landslide.  </p>
<p>I lived in Washington for 24 years and Washington just loves her.   I don&#8217;t know WHY Washington loves her, but they do.  The State GOP keeps throwing candidates at her that look good on paper, and they all get crushed. </p>
<p>Cantwell, I can understand.  I vote against her, I&#8217;m a Republican, but she&#8217;s reasonably intelligent, hardworking and pragmatic.  She&#8217;s capable at least.</p>
<p>Murray, on the other hand, seems to see the Government as nothing more then a giant ATM machine which she hits up for her favorite programs.  She doesn&#8217;t seem to understand much beyond that.  Yet she just does her &#8220;Mom in tennis shoes&#8221; schtick, and she wins big nomatter what. </p>
<p>:sigh: ah well.  While she&#8217;s stupid, at least she&#8217;s not vicious and rude like Barbara Boxer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogre Mage</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/02/21/murray-bloomberg/comment-page-1/#comment-9697</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogre Mage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=6317#comment-9697</guid>
		<description>As a Washington state resident, I am not surprised by the results of the Research 2000 poll.  At this point, it is likely that the WA GOP will field some independently wealthy Mike McGavick-style candidate (though not McGavick himself) rather than someone from their thin bench.  The highly probable result will be Murray's winning percentage being somewhere in the high 50s.  I could see her hitting 60% under certain circumstances.

A good but long profile of Sen. Murray can be found below:

http://www.seattleweekly.com/2009-01-28/news/patty-murray-s-unlikely-hill-climb/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Washington state resident, I am not surprised by the results of the Research 2000 poll.  At this point, it is likely that the WA GOP will field some independently wealthy Mike McGavick-style candidate (though not McGavick himself) rather than someone from their thin bench.  The highly probable result will be Murray&#8217;s winning percentage being somewhere in the high 50s.  I could see her hitting 60% under certain circumstances.</p>
<p>A good but long profile of Sen. Murray can be found below:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seattleweekly.com/2009-01-28/news/patty-murray-s-unlikely-hill-climb/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seattleweekly.com/2009-01-28/news/patty-murray-s-unlikely-hill-climb/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
