<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retirement and recruitment watch, Senate edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Stevens</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6653</guid>
		<description>As another Marylander, I agree with the implication of Mike in Maryland that former governor Ehrlich is the only Republican in this state at present who might be a fairly serious statewide candidate.  But I'd go so far as to say that he'd be very unlikely to defeat a Democratic Senate nominee even if it wasn't Mikulski.  If she retired, I'm sure that there would be a wild scramble among ambitious Democrats in the September primary.  Still, it's a very Democratic state and seems to be getting moreso all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another Marylander, I agree with the implication of Mike in Maryland that former governor Ehrlich is the only Republican in this state at present who might be a fairly serious statewide candidate.  But I&#8217;d go so far as to say that he&#8217;d be very unlikely to defeat a Democratic Senate nominee even if it wasn&#8217;t Mikulski.  If she retired, I&#8217;m sure that there would be a wild scramble among ambitious Democrats in the September primary.  Still, it&#8217;s a very Democratic state and seems to be getting moreso all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Maryland</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6633</guid>
		<description>Interesting that nobody is listed as a prospect for the Maryland Senate seat.  With Sen. Barbara Mikulski likely to run again, that's just as well.

Even if Mikulski retires, however, a GOP win is a long shot; ex-Gov. Bob Ehrlich seems to me to be the only Republican candidate with a decent chance of winning in an open seat situation (he wouldn't dislodge Mikulski if he tried) and he seems to have disavowed interest in running, at least so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that nobody is listed as a prospect for the Maryland Senate seat.  With Sen. Barbara Mikulski likely to run again, that&#8217;s just as well.</p>
<p>Even if Mikulski retires, however, a GOP win is a long shot; ex-Gov. Bob Ehrlich seems to me to be the only Republican candidate with a decent chance of winning in an open seat situation (he wouldn&#8217;t dislodge Mikulski if he tried) and he seems to have disavowed interest in running, at least so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Stevens</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6553</guid>
		<description>For Washington, you mean Murray rather than Leahy.  Also Davis, In Alabama, has an oddly-spelled first name of Artur (rather than Arthur).  But that's a pretty minor booboo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Washington, you mean Murray rather than Leahy.  Also Davis, In Alabama, has an oddly-spelled first name of Artur (rather than Arthur).  But that&#8217;s a pretty minor booboo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taniel</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6549</link>
		<dc:creator>Taniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6549</guid>
		<description>Interesting General/Governor slip - it's been corrected, as have Moore's titles and Dardenne's party. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting General/Governor slip - it&#8217;s been corrected, as have Moore&#8217;s titles and Dardenne&#8217;s party. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6548</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6548</guid>
		<description>As to Louisiana, Jay Dardenne is a Republican (which isn't to say he couldn't still run against Vitter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to Louisiana, Jay Dardenne is a Republican (which isn&#8217;t to say he couldn&#8217;t still run against Vitter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>Hey, Taniel. 
What's with calling the Lt. Governors like Carney and Mitch Landrieu, Lt. Generals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Taniel.<br />
What&#8217;s with calling the Lt. Governors like Carney and Mitch Landrieu, Lt. Generals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>The Dmes have a very deep bench in North Carolina. Easley is very unlikely to run, since Schumer tried to get him in 2008 against Dole and he said he did not want to become a senator becuase there were too many meetings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dmes have a very deep bench in North Carolina. Easley is very unlikely to run, since Schumer tried to get him in 2008 against Dole and he said he did not want to become a senator becuase there were too many meetings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: app state</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/01/12/senate-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>app state</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=5129#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>It's former Treasurer Richard Moore in NC, not Attorney General.

Nice new design too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s former Treasurer Richard Moore in NC, not Attorney General.</p>
<p>Nice new design too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
