<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caroline Kennedy, the Bloomberg connection and the daily drip of policy positions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Escape Inauguration Mania With Activism: Just Say No to Caroline! &#171; The Confluence</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-6958</link>
		<dc:creator>Escape Inauguration Mania With Activism: Just Say No to Caroline! &#171; The Confluence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-6958</guid>
		<description>[...] Caroline Kennedy and The Bloomberg Connection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caroline Kennedy and The Bloomberg Connection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escape Inauguration Mania With Activism: Just Say No To Caroline! &#171; Oooh, nuance!</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-6954</link>
		<dc:creator>Escape Inauguration Mania With Activism: Just Say No To Caroline! &#171; Oooh, nuance!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-6954</guid>
		<description>[...] Caroline Kennedy and The Bloomberg Connection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caroline Kennedy and The Bloomberg Connection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dannity</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-5224</link>
		<dc:creator>dannity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-5224</guid>
		<description>Living in NY, and having some limited familiarity with the political culture, resistance to Caroline is limited to three legitimate groups.

- Democratic party insiders: who feel they have a stake in the outcome and that they've waited their turn and carried the water they needed to carry to earn a shot to move up (i.e. supported Hillary).  Also, although Caroline is much less a carpetbagger than Hillary ever was, she's never been particularly active in local state politics, and while she has extensive fundraising creds, she's never flexed those muscles for state Democrats, so she's got no real in state political establishment or chits to cash in as of yet.  This is why the Times has treated her they way they have.

- Republican party insiders:  who have no real favorite, but recognize the fight is good for their chances to steal the seat in 2010.  Plus an incumbent Kennedy in NY would be virtually impossible to knock off, and an immediate national figure to deal with.

- all Republican voters: who just go wild at the mention of the name Kennedy.  They're outnumbered and they know it, so they pretend to be Democrats in the hopes that someone takes them seriously.

That's pretty much how it breaks down in-state.  The vast majority of Democratic voters I know have a favorable impression of Kennedy (unless they were a hardcore PUMA, and disliked anyone who didn't support Clinton over Obama) and don't really care who takes the Senate seat as long as they can't defend it.  Of course, the factions on the net are a different story, but</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Living in NY, and having some limited familiarity with the political culture, resistance to Caroline is limited to three legitimate groups.</p>
<p>- Democratic party insiders: who feel they have a stake in the outcome and that they&#8217;ve waited their turn and carried the water they needed to carry to earn a shot to move up (i.e. supported Hillary).  Also, although Caroline is much less a carpetbagger than Hillary ever was, she&#8217;s never been particularly active in local state politics, and while she has extensive fundraising creds, she&#8217;s never flexed those muscles for state Democrats, so she&#8217;s got no real in state political establishment or chits to cash in as of yet.  This is why the Times has treated her they way they have.</p>
<p>- Republican party insiders:  who have no real favorite, but recognize the fight is good for their chances to steal the seat in 2010.  Plus an incumbent Kennedy in NY would be virtually impossible to knock off, and an immediate national figure to deal with.</p>
<p>- all Republican voters: who just go wild at the mention of the name Kennedy.  They&#8217;re outnumbered and they know it, so they pretend to be Democrats in the hopes that someone takes them seriously.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much how it breaks down in-state.  The vast majority of Democratic voters I know have a favorable impression of Kennedy (unless they were a hardcore PUMA, and disliked anyone who didn&#8217;t support Clinton over Obama) and don&#8217;t really care who takes the Senate seat as long as they can&#8217;t defend it.  Of course, the factions on the net are a different story, but</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunter</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-5221</link>
		<dc:creator>gunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-5221</guid>
		<description>Caroline Kennedy?  Oh please.  Why don't people start try to recruit Amy Carter to the NY Senate seat.  She has about the same resume as Caroline Kennedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caroline Kennedy?  Oh please.  Why don&#8217;t people start try to recruit Amy Carter to the NY Senate seat.  She has about the same resume as Caroline Kennedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsimon</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-5220</link>
		<dc:creator>dsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-5220</guid>
		<description>Chris: &lt;i&gt;anyone else remotely worthy of the Seat have now removed themselves from contention.&lt;/i&gt;

I don't think that's true. Three-term Congressman Steve Israel would probably do a fine job. Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand would also be a good choice. They're both smart, extremely hard workers, have legislative experience, and can raise the money. And either one of them could hold the seat; Congressman Israel has shown he can win the "soccer mom" vote and can work with people across the aisle, and Gillibrand has now won twice (last time quite handily) in a Republican district.

I'd give either of them the nod over Kennedy, though I'm not saying she might not do a good job too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: <i>anyone else remotely worthy of the Seat have now removed themselves from contention.</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true. Three-term Congressman Steve Israel would probably do a fine job. Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand would also be a good choice. They&#8217;re both smart, extremely hard workers, have legislative experience, and can raise the money. And either one of them could hold the seat; Congressman Israel has shown he can win the &#8220;soccer mom&#8221; vote and can work with people across the aisle, and Gillibrand has now won twice (last time quite handily) in a Republican district.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d give either of them the nod over Kennedy, though I&#8217;m not saying she might not do a good job too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-5223</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-5223</guid>
		<description>But let's not forget that it was her UNCLES and FATHER that got into public service, and NOT HER.  Why has she waited?

More importantly, why the hell is she waiting to explain why she has waited to get into public service?  Obviously she'll give some canned answer, but it would be nice to have at least some insight.

Sure, she's a Kennedy.  But that's about all we can ascertain about her politics, other than the fact that she skipped a couple of primary votes (big friggin deal).

Ultimately, Andrew Cuomo is a grade-A jackass, and anyone else remotely worthy of the Seat have now removed themselves from contention.  So, I'll give - Caroline Kennedy may be the best bet.  But that's because its a poor field to pick from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But let&#8217;s not forget that it was her UNCLES and FATHER that got into public service, and NOT HER.  Why has she waited?</p>
<p>More importantly, why the hell is she waiting to explain why she has waited to get into public service?  Obviously she&#8217;ll give some canned answer, but it would be nice to have at least some insight.</p>
<p>Sure, she&#8217;s a Kennedy.  But that&#8217;s about all we can ascertain about her politics, other than the fact that she skipped a couple of primary votes (big friggin deal).</p>
<p>Ultimately, Andrew Cuomo is a grade-A jackass, and anyone else remotely worthy of the Seat have now removed themselves from contention.  So, I&#8217;ll give - Caroline Kennedy may be the best bet.  But that&#8217;s because its a poor field to pick from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/12/26/appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-5222</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.com/?p=4926#comment-5222</guid>
		<description>Caroline Kennedy would represent an role model to millions of Americans who were inspired into public service by her father and uncle's commitment to the American Dream. And there is a whole new generation that is too young to remember the 1960s that could learn about Camelot this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caroline Kennedy would represent an role model to millions of Americans who were inspired into public service by her father and uncle&#8217;s commitment to the American Dream. And there is a whole new generation that is too young to remember the 1960s that could learn about Camelot this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
