With 13 days left before Election Day, John McCain cannot afford a single misstep, but he just had a bad night that augurs badly for his campaign’s confidence, polling trend lines and financial viability.
It is not good for McCain that the coverage he is receiving is increasingly devoted to strategic questions: can he come-back, what will he do to soften up Obama, where does he have a chance, and where is he spending his money? This makes it that much more difficult for McCain to unleash a new attack without being labeled desperate or for him to travel to any red state without a wave of stories being written about why he feels the need to campaign in that state in the first place. In nowhere is this more true than in Pennsylvania - witness this devastating lead in a New York Times article: “People are scratching their heads: Why is Senator John McCain here?”
That said, the McCain campaign’s strategic and financial decisions are necessarily scrutinized more closely because he is playing catch-up in the electoral college and because he has so few resources compared to his opponent that he needs to make more tough (sometimes very tough) calls. And the latest round of expenditures decisions is bound to be very consequential.
The McCain campaign is not pulling out of any new state, but it is reassessing its priorities and it is shifting some money out of five states, where the advertisement money that was supposed to be spend over one week will now be spread out over two weeks - all the way to Election Day. The five states are New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Maine, Minnesota (all blue states) and… Colorado.
Yes, red Colorado, whose 9 electoral votes combined with Obama’s base of blue states, Iowa and New Mexico is enough to make Obama president. Now, it is important to not overstate this news: The McCain campaign is still spending in the state and the RNC’s independent expenditure division is up on air. But the McCain campaign’s decision is certainly a sign that Republicans are worried the state is too far gone for McCain to still have a shot.
The resources that McCain is pulling out of those five states will go instead to Indiana and to the Miami media market - one of the most expensive in the country. The RNC was already airing ads in Indiana - but not the McCain campaign, yet another sign that the Hoosier state is a highly competitive battleground state. Who would have thought a Republican candidate would have to spend its resources in Indiana instead of Wisconsin and New Hampshire in the final weeks of a presidential campaign? That fact alone summarizes how precarious McCain’s position.
Where does all of this leave McCain? How can he possibly win the White House if he does not capture Colorado (and we aren’t even speaking of other highly vulnerable red states)? He would then be betting everything on Pennsylvania, the one blue state McCain is still fully investing in, and its 21 electoral votes, with which McCain can even afford to lose Virginia.
Trouble is, Pennsylvania polls are atrocious for McCain - and not just over the past five weeks, in which Obama has led by double digits in almost every single public poll. Sure, McCain significantly closed the gap in mid-September, but the last time McCain has led in a poll from the state was in April, just two days after the state’s divisive Democratic primary.
So the McCain campaign appears to have largely come down to the improbable quest for a stunning Pennsylvania comeback. This is a testament to the high odds the campaign faces, but it is not a particularly dumb a move considering McCain’s current situation. The Arizona Senator has his back against the wall and too little money to defend all the red states he needs to win in a sweep that looks increasingly unlikely; he has to make some choices and take a stand in some places but not in others.
Choosing to keep up a large effort in Pennsylvania allows McCain to keep a focused effort in a large state in case he tightens the race nationally in the final 13 days. Furthermore, if there is one state that could see suggestions of racialized voting and perhaps some Bradley effect, it could be Pennsylvania. The state has a history of Democratic voting on the strength of culturally conservative Democrats - and it is that constituency that might be the most prone to pulling away from Obama because of race. Rep. Murtha alluded to this last week by calling his own district “racist,” and Governor Ed Rendell was just revealed to have written two memos to the Obama campaign expressing his “nervousness” about the state and pleading for the nominee to return to campaign in the state.
(I also suggested this morning that one factor behind McCain privileging Pennsylvania to Colorado could be that the former, unlike the latter, does not have early voting so Obama is not able to build on his current momentum and lock in any votes.)
Furthermore, as is typical of any struggling campaign, McCain is being hurt by a slow drip of blind quotes, tactical second-guessing and staff infighting spilling in the media. Mark Salter’s rant yesterday or the New York Times magazine cover story that is coming out on Sunday are the mark of angry aides that are increasingly unwilling to wait until November 5th to voice their frustration. As Hillary Clinton learned in the first few months of the primary, an undisciplined campaign quickly becomes a great distraction.
But perhaps no distraction will be as great in the coming days as Politico’s bombshell revelation that the RNC spent $150,000 “to clothe and accessorize” Sarah Palin and her family over the past seven weeks. This is obviously a huge amount, and one that could land the McCain campaign in legal trouble “under the Federal Election Commission’s long-standing advisory opinions on using campaign cash to purchase items for personal use.”
At the very least, this is a highly embarrassing revelation that surpasses in scope any parallel story that comes to mind (starting with John Edwards’s $400 haircut, which so many Republicans like Mike Huckabee mocked mercilessly). Not only does it come at a particularly inopportune time given the GOP’s effort to not look out-of-touch in times of economic crisis, it also seems like the kind of story that will spark yet another round of intra-GOP fighting - as if the Palin pick had not already caused enough divisions among conservatives.
Overall, then, this is not the type of coverage McCain wants to receive. At this point, every news cycle passed without his landing a major blow on Barack Obama is a news cycle wasted - and there aren’t many news cycles left.
One more piece of evidence that Sarah Palin was the worst pick possible (outside of Bill Ayres, that is) for the GOP VP slot. And it was all McCain’s doing, his idea, based on his “maveick” judgement, so it is only appropriate that he’s the one to suffer.
All the talk out of the GOP of Palin being their standard-bearer in 2012 kind of suggest that even the RNC doesn’t think much of McCain’s chances.
I hope they do run her in 2012, in fact the quicker they run that party irretrievably into the ground the better.
One thing I’ve noticed, if you could comment on it: crowd size. I watched McCain in Moon, PA yesterday, and at most he was talking to a few hundred people in what looked like someone’s basement. Contrast that to Obama, who goes to a red State like Missouri and draws 100,000, or 50,000 in Florida. This might just be numbers, but is it evident of the enthusiasm gap? And will this be evident on Nov. 4?
Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all, but I’m in a profession, and over the last day or so, several Repubs have told me that the Palin nomination clinched their support for Obama. IMO, the GOP is heading for a major tong war between the Know-Nothing element (being urged on by the nativist Buchanan) and the more intellectual wing, represented by Brooks, K. Parker and C. Buckley.
Palin is a thief, and she needs to be tried on federal theft. I cannot fathom why she would not face prosecution or at least a demand to reimburse the state since she allowed herself to receive many gifts and bill the state for her kids’ greedy expenses in the name of reform. The McCains and Palins are so bizarre to me.
Palin is the worst and perhaps most corrupt politician trying to battle corruption, ironically and hypocritically. And ifthis woman runs in 2012, I am sure a President Obama will easily crush her. I fear, however, he will be handicapped in his ability to effectively compete with her simply because you have got to handle a woman like babies, at least as Americans feel that way. This nation needs to stop preaching a culture of double standards, or else take the right to vote away from women.
Palin is the worst and perhaps most corrupt politician trying to battle corruption, ironically and hypocritically. And ifthis woman runs in 2012, I am sure a President Obama will easily crush her. I fear, however, he will be handicapped in his ability to effectively compete with her simply because you have got to handle a woman like babies, at least as Americans feel that way. This nation needs to stop preaching a culture of double standards, or else take the right to vote away from women.
****AMERICA SHOULD BE FEARFULLY CONCERNED****
In the last month, After Governor Sarah Palin and HER Administration was refused by The Alaska Superior Court, then refused by The Alaska Supreme Court to SQUASH the “Troopergate Investigation” against Sarah Palin, the Alaska State Legislative Investigation (LAW) moved on the investigation of the Firing of the Alaska State Public Safety Commissioner.
Gov.Sarah Palin “IS” found “GUILTY” by The Alaska State Legislature [60] Lawmakers, [Mostly Republicans] .in the Investigation of Firing” The Chief of The Alaska State Public Safety Commissioner, Walt Monegan.
TROOPERGATE: In plain English, Sarah Palin has been legally PROVEN that she broke the Alaska State Ethics Law in ABUSING HER power in pushing for the firing of a State Trooper once married to her sister and by also ALLOWING her husband Todd Palin to use the Alaska Governor’s Office in a crusade against the Officer. She is charged with 18 Ethic Violation Facts.
Currently the State of Alaska Personnel Board [appointed by Sara Palin} hired a private Investigator to continue the “Troopergate Investigation” on possible OTHER Ethic Violations which Palin allowed HER appointed Administration to participate in. Sarah Palins appointed State of Alaska, Attorney General Colberg, cannot participate to defend Gov. Palin or to defend her Administration. Why? Because he also is in conflict of interest
ALASKA GOVERNOR RECALL!
I am an Alaskan life voting Republican. This 2008 Election, I will [with pleasure] vote Democrat!
This Alaska Governor Palin has Destroyed and continues to attempt to Destroy “MANY GOOD ALASKAN PEOPLE(s)” Professionally and Politically during her “VERY SHORT” term position as Mayor in a small community Wasilla, Ak (Approx 5,000 + residents during her reign) and currently the Alaska State Governor.
McCain’s V.P. selection Sarah Palin unequivocally has NO business being the Alaska Governor, let alone, a USA Candidate for Vice President…..
Maverick??…..”AMERICA SHOULD BE FEARFULLY CONCERNED”
I voted for Sarah Palin in Alaskans 2006 Governor Election. MISTAKE!…. Never Again… I repeat-NEVER AGAIN!!….Alaska Governor Palin is an absolute Embarrassment to the Alaska People(s) and “IS PROVEN” Over and Over to be an insatiable LIAR!!..
.
How can she possibly ASSUME to possess the ability to clean up America, when she cannot clean the progressive ”MESS” She has created, then left Alaska to run for the United States V.P. Yes, she .departed leaving “HERSELF and HER husband todd palins” Mess FOR Alaskans to Clean-Up!!
MCCAIN, you should be ASHAMED of yourself!!!! This victim (palin) has no business in this Presidential Arena.
Posted by: Alaskan Voter
Thank You,
History of Palin News & Investigation Report adn.com/Newsweek
McClatchy.com; Washington Post
Anchorage Daily News a.dn.com ;Newsweek; Alaska Politics