It is a testament to Obama’s dominance that a 9% lead in a national poll or a 2% lead in a Missouri survey almost seem underwhelming. But there is no question that almost every single polling data over the past two weeks oscillates from very good to stunning for Obama. Democrats are left worrying that Gallup’s tracking has Obama up only 7%, that Hotline is only at 6% or that Obama’s advantage in Suffolk’s Colorado survey is only 4% - and the very same day brings surveys that have Obama up double digits nationally and by 9% in Colorado.
The New York Times/CBS national poll is particularly noteworthy, of course, as the match-up itself (53% to 39% for Obama) is perhaps the least exciting news for Obama in that survey: He has now tied McCain among whites, and has jumped to a very solid hold on registered Democrats and Clinton supporters. And there are signs that his multi-million advertisement efforts are paying off, as more voters now think of McCain as susceptible to raise their taxes!
While Obama’s lead in this poll is certainly on the high end of his national results, what should frighten Republicans is that it is in no way out of line with other surveys and other internals: Most polls now have Obama in the high 80s among registered Democrats (take a look at Quinnipiac’s latest wave of state surveys, where Obama gets 93% party loyalty in Michigan and Colorado).
Furthermore, Obama continues to improve his hold on blue states (as evidenced by Quinnipiac’s release and the fact that he posts his seventh straight double-digit Pennsylvania lead) and McCain is unable to even hold on a lead within the MoE in any of the competitive red states. Obama leads outside of the MoE in OH and CO today, within the MoE in CO, NC and MO. In fact, this is the third poll in two days that has Obama leading in Missouri. On to the day’s full roundup:
- Obama crushes McCain 53% to 39% in a national CBS/NYT poll of likely voters! The internals are quite stunning for Obama. Asked which candidate will raise their taxes, respondents answer… McCain, 51% to 46%! Obama leads by 18% among independents, and he gets 63% among first time voters - that number alone should make Republicans panicked, as it is likely those voters are not fully picked up by pollsters.
- Obama leads 50% to 41% in a national LA Times/Bloomberg poll of likely voters. Three weeks ago, Obama led by 4%. 49% of respondents now say he has the right experience to be president, versus 37% in the previous three weeks ago. Only 10% say the country is in the right direction - the lowest number since 1991.
- Obama leads 50% to 45% in a SUSA poll of Ohio. McCain led by 1% two weeks ago. Democrats have a strong partisan advantage. 12% of voters say they have already voted, and Obama leads by 18% in that group.
- Obama leads 52% to 43% in a Quinnipiac poll of Colorado. Obama led by 4% in late September. gets 93% of the Democratic vote.
- Obama leads 47% to 43% in a Suffolk poll of Colorado.
- Obama leads 49% to 46% in a PPP poll of North Carolina. He led by 6% last week.
- Obama leads 48% to 46% in a PPP poll of Missouri. The previous PPP poll of Missouri, taken mid-August, had McCain leading by 10%. A key shift: Obama has gone from 78% to 89% of the Democratic vote.
- Obama leads 55% to 40% in a SUSA poll of Pennsylvania. This is the same margin as last week.
- Obama leads 54% to 37% in a Quinnipiac poll of Wisconsin. Obama led by 7% in late September. Today, he gets 92% of the Democratic vote.
- Obama leads 51% to 40% in a Quinnipiac poll of Minnesota. Obama led by 2% in late September. Obama gets 90% of the Democratic vote.
- Obama leads 54% to 38% in a Quinnipiac poll of Michigan. Obama led by 4% in late September. He gets 93% of the Democratic vote.
- Obama leads 56% to 41% in a Rasmussen poll of Delaware.
- Two presidential match-up numbers from House districts: In PA-11, a district Kerry won by 6%, Obama leads by only 4% according to Research 2000. In PA-03, a district Bush won by 6%, Obama leads by 2% according to Research 2000.
- Four presidential match-up numbers in key swing counties courtesy of Politico and Insider Advantage. All have Obama gaining over the 2004 results: In North Carolina’s Wake County, Obama leads by 6% - a 12% turnaround since 2004. In Nevada’s Washoe County, Obama leads by 1% - a 5% turnaround. In Florida’s Hillsborough County (Tampa), Obama leads by 6% - a 13% turnaround since 2004. And in Colorado’s Jefferson County, McCain leads by 1% - a 4% improvement for Obama.
Meanwhile, in down-the-ballot polls:
- Mark Udall leads 54% to 40% in a Quinnipiac poll of Colorado’s Senate race. Three weeks ago, Udall led by 8%.
- Udall leads 45% to 34% in a Suffolk poll of Colorado’s Senate race.
- Al Franken leads 38% to 36% with 18% to Barkley in a Quinnipiac poll of Minnesota’s Senate race. Three weeks ago, Coleman led by 7% though Barkley was not included.
- Kay Hagan leads 46% to 44% in a PPP poll of North Carolina’s Senate race. She led by 9% last week, which was a high point for her - but this 2% lead is also a decline from the survey results two weeks ago.
- Nixon leads 52% to 39% in a PPP poll of Missouri’s gubernatorial race.
- In PA-11, Lou Barletta leads 43% to 39% against Democratic Rep. Kanjorski in a new Research 2000 poll.
- In PA-03, Kathy Dahlkemper leads 48% to 41% against GOP Rep. English in a new Research 2000 poll.
- In PA-04, an internal poll for the Altmire campaign finds the Democratic incumbent ahead 53% to 41%.
- In MD-01, an internal poll for Frank Kratovil has the Democrat narrowly ahead 43% to 41%.
- In NJ-03, a DCCC internal poll finds Democratic state Senator Adler leading 37% to 33%, within the MoE.
- In NJ-07, a DCCC internal poll finds Democratic candidate Linda Stender 40% to 31%.
- In WA-08, a DCCC internal poll has Darcy Burner ahead 49% to 44%.
Senate: Colorado’s Senate race has been remarkably brutal over the past few months - and yet it has been covered very little nationally, especially compared to the Minnesota or North Carolina Senate races. At the end of the day, this one will matter just as much as the others, and while Udall has been ahead for an entire year now, he has been unable to close the deal and Schaffer has stayed within striking distance. It looks like Udall is finally building a solid lead, as Quinnipiac and Suffolk make it three polls in a row to find the Democrat leading by double-digit. Colorado has not yet joined Virginia and New Mexico as sure Democratic pick-ups, but with 3 weeks until election day the situation is good for Udall.
The two other Senate races find some good news for both candidates. The Minnesota Senate race is certainly now a toss-up after Coleman appeared to pull away in September. Quinnipiac and SUSA, both of whom had big Republican leads here, now have the race within the MoE, and Barkley remains a huge factor. As for North Carolina, I have pointed out many times that the pessimism of Republican operatives isn’t matched by poll numbers, where Hagan has certainly inched ahead but Dole remains highly competitive.
House: First, the independent polls, as they confirm what we already know: Rep. English is not doing well at all, and the extent to which he is vulnerable is surprising given that the race was not in the top tier as of 6 weeks ago. In PA-11, Rep. Kanjorski is in huge trouble, as is any incumbent who is below 40, and he looks set to lose his seat. Not only that, but Barletta’s internal polls are in line with independent surveys whereas Kanjorski’s are way off. But it is the DCCC’s internal polling that continues to differ from independent surveys - with their numbers in NJ-07 and WA-08 being skewed to the Democrat compared to recent independent polling. Make of that what you will, of course, and one could very well argue that the Democrat’s turnout model is more accurate, but as always take internal surveys with a grain of salt unless they are confirmed by independent numbers.
I’m still wondering why McCain continually plods away in Pennsylvania. Every single PA poll for the last three to four weeks has given Obama an ever growing lead, with his lowest presenty hanging around +10. Does McCain seriously think he can peel off enough rural PA votes; i.e. by sending Palin to the sticks to talk abortion? I find this especially odd given that states like Missouri are leaning Obama. Is this the only path left, to go against all odds to take a Kerry state to balance any Bush states McCain might lose?
McCain is focussing on PA because he wants to be seen as being on the offensive somewhere. Even though there are no good targets for him.
Good to see the Wake County, NC data. It is the largest county in NC with over 600000 voters and looking at the yard signs, car stickers and radio ads it is Obama country. There are now signs sprouting up saying “Carolina is Obama Country”. Something is happening in North Carolina (for the better)!
Taniel, I think in 1992 some polls showed Bill Clinton hoovering at up to 19% in the final few weeks of the election, yet he won by only 6%. Same thing happened to Carter, when he was at 13% in the final stretch of the election before winning by 3%. Now, I wonder if in this era of info culture where better tech is utilized in collecting data Obama will still face the same outcome and ultimately lose the election, especially if more than 10% of the electorate is undecided?
Jarret, I think the McCain campaign simply can only hope it might somehow win PA or come close. It probably knows they cannot win. I think it was a strategic mistake, but mistakes are are the way by which the campaign seems to operate in some respect. They better pull out of states that are unlikely to inch toward McCain’s direction and dedicate all the resoruces to mroe competitive states. But arrogance and strategic failures what make up the campaign.
Anonymous 10:02,
I’m somewhat worried about something like that happening, but from what I’ve seen about the polls from ‘76 and ‘92, I don’t think they were that far off.
In 1976, Carter was way ahead until September, when he was strongly attacked by Ford, and he made several gaffes (”I’ve committed adultary many times in my heart”) which allowed Ford to catch up with him and even pull ahead in some cases. However, Carter shot up again after Ford made a gaffe of his own (”There is no Soviet domination in Poland”). The poll you cited could be from this period. Carter’s bounce was fading by election day however, and Gallup even had Ford ahead.
1992 was a very difficult election to poll because there were three candidates, but while some polls had Clinton much higher, 5 points was his average after Perot reentered the race.
How does this long-winded history relate to ‘08?
I doubt that Obama will win by double digits, but his average lead is clearly in the mid to high single digits.
Jarrett,
My sense is that McCain doesn’t really have a choice. He can’t just withdraw from Pennsylvania - that would also allow Obama to shift his own resources and staff, and would lead Obama to be doing nothing else than playing offense. McCain needs to change something nationally at this point, not at the state level - and if the national numbers substantially tighten Pennsylvania could be in play again.
Remember that in the elections of 1976 and 1992, the democratic challenger was running against an incumbent president. Also, one cannot really compare Obama to either Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton. I remember the 1976 election vividly; I thought Carter was a breath of fresh air after the terrible nightmare of the Johnson-Nixon years.
I think, if you want to draw analogies with previous elections, you might also mention 1960. Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic, was in somewhat the same position that Obama is now: many WASPs did not trust him, even though he was plainly very charismatic and intelligent. Nixon, on the other hand, was really running on Eisenhower’s record. In our present case, McCain is running FROM Bush’s record. If comparisons to previous elections are of any value, this would appear to indicate that Obama will win by a small but comfortable margin.