<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll watch: First signs of a McCain bounce, a third tracking poll (!), Indiana is competitive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zoot</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>zoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>Per Gallup, the bounce is gone - 47-45.

http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx

Let's see what Tuesday/Wednesday brings. Both campaigns are suspending attack ads on 9-11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per Gallup, the bounce is gone - 47-45.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx</a></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what Tuesday/Wednesday brings. Both campaigns are suspending attack ads on 9-11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoot</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>zoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>Anonymous, agree absolutely, but it is what it is - the air is crackling with resentment over gender, class, race, globalization, hair and eye color (;-), you name it. Sure, Obama can vindicate the principle of absolute equality of treatment while starting up a dynamic that will defeat him.

It's like a dog sizing up a raccoon - he knows he's going to get hurt real bad if he just charges straight ahead, so sometimes the better alternative is just steer a wide arc around her....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, agree absolutely, but it is what it is - the air is crackling with resentment over gender, class, race, globalization, hair and eye color (;-), you name it. Sure, Obama can vindicate the principle of absolute equality of treatment while starting up a dynamic that will defeat him.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a dog sizing up a raccoon - he knows he&#8217;s going to get hurt real bad if he just charges straight ahead, so sometimes the better alternative is just steer a wide arc around her&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>Obama cannot frontally attack Palin just because he fears female backlash on the basis of perceived sexism? For the life of me, I cannot udnerstand this double standard culture. If male politicians fear running their campaigns effectively and efficiently because their opponents are females, then either we should never hav female politicians or let women do all the campaigning. No candidate should be insulated from intense political scrutiny on the basis of gender.
I think the only reason McCain picked up Palin is to fend off any attacks on him and his vice presidential runing mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama cannot frontally attack Palin just because he fears female backlash on the basis of perceived sexism? For the life of me, I cannot udnerstand this double standard culture. If male politicians fear running their campaigns effectively and efficiently because their opponents are females, then either we should never hav female politicians or let women do all the campaigning. No candidate should be insulated from intense political scrutiny on the basis of gender.<br />
I think the only reason McCain picked up Palin is to fend off any attacks on him and his vice presidential runing mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoot</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>zoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>Palin will not appear on any Sunday talk shows, and Rick Davis refuses to make any commitment re when or even if she will do so -  http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/.

Those of us (including zoot) who intellectualize presidential politics too much  risk falling into mortal sin. In a rational world, this nomination should be given the hook. In the real world, it poses one of the biggest challenges Obama's campaign has faced.

Palin cannot be attacked frontally - she has to be forced into an environment where her inadequacies on critical issues will manifest themselves independently, and this has to be done respectfully, without the appearance of bullying.  QED the refusal to expose her to interviews, thereby increasing the importance of the VP debate. In the meanwhile, they'll keep running her onto the stump in critical states with pre-packaged speeches and total insulation from the press, while relentlessly attacking the MSM with the intent of cowing them into submission and defusing inclination when the time comes to push her too hard on questions she won't be able to answer.

Viewed that way, a lot depends on who's moderating the debate:  - fortunately, it's Gwen Ifill. http://tinyurl.com/5wksbu. A Wolf Blitzer would attack with a marshmallow hammer, but Ifill won't let her stop with her pre-packaged responses.

That may also explain the current Obama strategy of ignoring her and going at McCain - they haven't yet decided there's much they can do about her directly without getting in too deep. Obama's appearance tomorrow with Stephanopoulos (not the most incisive interviewer) should tell us more.

Bizarre....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin will not appear on any Sunday talk shows, and Rick Davis refuses to make any commitment re when or even if she will do so -  <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/</a>.</p>
<p>Those of us (including zoot) who intellectualize presidential politics too much  risk falling into mortal sin. In a rational world, this nomination should be given the hook. In the real world, it poses one of the biggest challenges Obama&#8217;s campaign has faced.</p>
<p>Palin cannot be attacked frontally - she has to be forced into an environment where her inadequacies on critical issues will manifest themselves independently, and this has to be done respectfully, without the appearance of bullying.  QED the refusal to expose her to interviews, thereby increasing the importance of the VP debate. In the meanwhile, they&#8217;ll keep running her onto the stump in critical states with pre-packaged speeches and total insulation from the press, while relentlessly attacking the MSM with the intent of cowing them into submission and defusing inclination when the time comes to push her too hard on questions she won&#8217;t be able to answer.</p>
<p>Viewed that way, a lot depends on who&#8217;s moderating the debate:  - fortunately, it&#8217;s Gwen Ifill. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5wksbu" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5wksbu</a>. A Wolf Blitzer would attack with a marshmallow hammer, but Ifill won&#8217;t let her stop with her pre-packaged responses.</p>
<p>That may also explain the current Obama strategy of ignoring her and going at McCain - they haven&#8217;t yet decided there&#8217;s much they can do about her directly without getting in too deep. Obama&#8217;s appearance tomorrow with Stephanopoulos (not the most incisive interviewer) should tell us more.</p>
<p>Bizarre&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coco</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>Coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>Saturday  Rasmussen Tracking: Obama 49, McCain 46.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday  Rasmussen Tracking: Obama 49, McCain 46.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Alaska polling result, I am not surprised given that the state is the most conservative and I would have expected McCain to win had he picked a conservative VP. And if Obama continued to lead there, it would be very surprising for me.
I wonder why voters are changing their opinions of the candidates as if they were being fickles. . Perhaps the fact that Palin was suddenly thurst into the public eye as almost completely unknown politician moved some voters toward McCain. But it is really bizarre to me that voters would think she is qualified based entirely on her speech despite all the revelations of potential abuse of power in public office. Speaking from a personl point of view, I think voters who think she is ready to be president are hypocrites and fickles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Alaska polling result, I am not surprised given that the state is the most conservative and I would have expected McCain to win had he picked a conservative VP. And if Obama continued to lead there, it would be very surprising for me.<br />
I wonder why voters are changing their opinions of the candidates as if they were being fickles. . Perhaps the fact that Palin was suddenly thurst into the public eye as almost completely unknown politician moved some voters toward McCain. But it is really bizarre to me that voters would think she is qualified based entirely on her speech despite all the revelations of potential abuse of power in public office. Speaking from a personl point of view, I think voters who think she is ready to be president are hypocrites and fickles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmc</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/09/05/friday-poll-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>bmc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=2347#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>Palin-Mania Sweeping Nation

ANCHORAGE, Sept. 5, 2008

(CBS) There’s a new economic boom in Alaska — and it has nothing to do with oil.

Call it “Palin-mania.”

Companies are cashing in on a new craze sweeping the country sparked by the sudden fame of John McCain’s running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, reports CBS News correspondent John Blackstone.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/05/earlyshow/printable4418621.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin-Mania Sweeping Nation</p>
<p>ANCHORAGE, Sept. 5, 2008</p>
<p>(CBS) There’s a new economic boom in Alaska — and it has nothing to do with oil.</p>
<p>Call it “Palin-mania.”</p>
<p>Companies are cashing in on a new craze sweeping the country sparked by the sudden fame of John McCain’s running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, reports CBS News correspondent John Blackstone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/05/earlyshow/printable4418621.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/05/earlyshow/printable4418621.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
