<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polls: Obama up 9 in Quinnipiac, 8 in WaPo, 6 in NYT; Landrieu, Udall lead GOP opponents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taniel</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>Taniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>(1) Guy: not all of Obama's recent positions are reiterating old ones. FISA isn't, and neither is Heller v. DC. Apart from that, I don't think Obama is moving to the center as much as being less shy about expressing his centrist positions (like &lt;a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/10/the-positioning-game-obama-and-the-iranian-revolutionary-guard/" rel="nofollow"&gt;on Iran&lt;/a&gt;). As for the issue of seducing independents, I am not sure why he has to: ex-GOPers are now independents, but ex-independents are also Democrats. Overall, the center has moved &lt;em&gt;leftward&lt;/em&gt; over the past four years, not rightward. Strategically, I think it makes even less sense for Obama to wage a centrist campaign than it did for Al Gore 8 years ago.

(2) Eileen/Kell: an internal poll does not mean a biased poll. There is no question that the Moore poll is an internal one. The RCP link clearly indicates that the poll was taken by a GOP firm for the Rossi campaign -- that's the definition of internal poll.

That does not mean, of course, that the poll is biased, and I don't think that's what Kell meant. What she meant is that it is important to never fully trust an internal poll until you get confirmation from an independent poll. You never know what other questions were asked, how much leaners were pushed, why this poll is being released rather than other ones, etc. That's why I wrote that we should take the results from the polls in PA-03 and OH-16 with a grain of salt, for instance.

In this particular case, the result of the internal poll and of the independent poll are not meaningfully different from each other and both confirm what we already knew -- that the race will be tight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) Guy: not all of Obama&#8217;s recent positions are reiterating old ones. FISA isn&#8217;t, and neither is Heller v. DC. Apart from that, I don&#8217;t think Obama is moving to the center as much as being less shy about expressing his centrist positions (like <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/10/the-positioning-game-obama-and-the-iranian-revolutionary-guard/" rel="nofollow">on Iran</a>). As for the issue of seducing independents, I am not sure why he has to: ex-GOPers are now independents, but ex-independents are also Democrats. Overall, the center has moved <em>leftward</em> over the past four years, not rightward. Strategically, I think it makes even less sense for Obama to wage a centrist campaign than it did for Al Gore 8 years ago.</p>
<p>(2) Eileen/Kell: an internal poll does not mean a biased poll. There is no question that the Moore poll is an internal one. The RCP link clearly indicates that the poll was taken by a GOP firm for the Rossi campaign &#8212; that&#8217;s the definition of internal poll.</p>
<p>That does not mean, of course, that the poll is biased, and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what Kell meant. What she meant is that it is important to never fully trust an internal poll until you get confirmation from an independent poll. You never know what other questions were asked, how much leaners were pushed, why this poll is being released rather than other ones, etc. That&#8217;s why I wrote that we should take the results from the polls in PA-03 and OH-16 with a grain of salt, for instance.</p>
<p>In this particular case, the result of the internal poll and of the independent poll are not meaningfully different from each other and both confirm what we already knew &#8212; that the race will be tight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4757</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4757</guid>
		<description>Kell...

Not quite as internal as you insinuate. See David Postman's review of the poll...

"By the way, that poll mentioned in the Gregoire release was done by Moore Research in Portland. Blogger Daniel Kirkdorffer asked pollster Bob Moore the question that others didn’t before publicizing the results. He wanted to know specifically what question voters were asked about the governor’s race. Moore told Kirkdorffer in an e-mail the question was:

Looking ahead, if the election for Governor was held today and the candidates were (rotate names) Dino Rossi, prefers GOP party, and Christine Gregoire, prefers Democratic party, for whom would you vote?"

http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/2008/07/insert_texas_pun_here.html

Doesn't sound like a biased poll to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kell&#8230;</p>
<p>Not quite as internal as you insinuate. See David Postman&#8217;s review of the poll&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;By the way, that poll mentioned in the Gregoire release was done by Moore Research in Portland. Blogger Daniel Kirkdorffer asked pollster Bob Moore the question that others didn’t before publicizing the results. He wanted to know specifically what question voters were asked about the governor’s race. Moore told Kirkdorffer in an e-mail the question was:</p>
<p>Looking ahead, if the election for Governor was held today and the candidates were (rotate names) Dino Rossi, prefers GOP party, and Christine Gregoire, prefers Democratic party, for whom would you vote?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/2008/07/insert_texas_pun_here.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/2008/07/insert_texas_pun_here.html</a></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t sound like a biased poll to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KELL</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>KELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>Eileen...

You are showing a Rossi sponsored "internal" poll there, versus one that is more independent. From your link:

"The poll, conducted by Moore Information, a Republican firm based in Portland, Oregon, surveyed 400 registered voters between 7/9-10 for a margin of error of +/- 4.9%. Moore Information has done work for the Republican Governors' Association before, but this poll was not sponsored by the RGA. (Major update: The poll was conducted for Rossi's campaign. We regret the oversight.) Gregoire and Rossi were tested."

A majority of polls has the Democrat up a few points, which seems to be the consistent thing. This poll shows it tied and it's from a GOP related firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen&#8230;</p>
<p>You are showing a Rossi sponsored &#8220;internal&#8221; poll there, versus one that is more independent. From your link:</p>
<p>&#8220;The poll, conducted by Moore Information, a Republican firm based in Portland, Oregon, surveyed 400 registered voters between 7/9-10 for a margin of error of +/- 4.9%. Moore Information has done work for the Republican Governors&#8217; Association before, but this poll was not sponsored by the RGA. (Major update: The poll was conducted for Rossi&#8217;s campaign. We regret the oversight.) Gregoire and Rossi were tested.&#8221;</p>
<p>A majority of polls has the Democrat up a few points, which seems to be the consistent thing. This poll shows it tied and it&#8217;s from a GOP related firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>I don`t think the "move" to the center was a strategic blunder. First he reiterated ideas he has always held - for example on faith based initiatives so there was no move to the center and secondly he has to remain competitive with Independents who are now more Republican minded because GOP voters have drifted over to Independent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don`t think the &#8220;move&#8221; to the center was a strategic blunder. First he reiterated ideas he has always held - for example on faith based initiatives so there was no move to the center and secondly he has to remain competitive with Independents who are now more Republican minded because GOP voters have drifted over to Independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>You're data on the Washington State Gubernatorial Race is a bit outdated! This poll came out yesterday.

"General Election Matchup
Gregoire........45 (-2 from last, 7/07)
Rossi.............45 (+2)"

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/07/all_tied_up_in_wa.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re data on the Washington State Gubernatorial Race is a bit outdated! This poll came out yesterday.</p>
<p>&#8220;General Election Matchup<br />
Gregoire&#8230;&#8230;..45 (-2 from last, 7/07)<br />
Rossi&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.45 (+2)&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/07/all_tied_up_in_wa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/07/all_tied_up_in_wa.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>The point is that even in red states where Obama has perhaps little chance, he can still force McCain to divert funds and energy in order to hold those red states. And while McCain is fighting on what should be safe turf, he will hardly have time to open up battlegrounds against Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that even in red states where Obama has perhaps little chance, he can still force McCain to divert funds and energy in order to hold those red states. And while McCain is fighting on what should be safe turf, he will hardly have time to open up battlegrounds against Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/15/tuesday-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-4752</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/?p=1027#comment-4752</guid>
		<description>I'm sure South Carolina won't be competitive by the end but wow, there are more and more red states where Obama looks strong. This could really be a landslide if Obama plays it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure South Carolina won&#8217;t be competitive by the end but wow, there are more and more red states where Obama looks strong. This could really be a landslide if Obama plays it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
