VP watch: Romney’s fundraising potential and the emergence of Thune and Portman

In a much-discussed article published in Politico, Mike Allen challenges the conventional wisdom that gives an edge to Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty by identifying the top-tier of McCain’s veepstakes as Mitt Romney, Rob Portman and Jon Thune. However little Portman and Thune’s names have been associated with the top-tier up until now, the list does make sense in that it leaves out the unorthodox candidates that would be most likely to anger conservatives.

Allen makes room for the other piece of conventional wisdom that is now widely spread about the Republican veepstakes: McCain wants someone with whom he has personal chemistry, and this is the main obstacle on Romney’s path. As you might remember, Romney and McCain’s relationship was icy throughout the primary season, culminating in a nasty ad war in New Hampshire and in a stunningly petty debate in which Romney was reduced to a bullied kid (on January 6th). Their relationship has warmed up ever since, and Romney was included in the list of guests to McCain’s ranch a few weeks ago.

An important reason the article provides for Romney being so high on the list is that his selection would allow McCain to tap in his fundraising network “through his former business partners and from fellow members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the Mormons.” Allen adds: “McCain sources tell Politico that they believe Romney could raise $50 million in 60 days. One close Romney adviser said it could even be $60 million.”

I am not exactly sure what this could mean, and how Romney’s fundraising potential is supposed to impact the race. McCain will receive public financing for the general election campaign and will no longer be able to use private donations once he accepts the nomination on September 5th. Until then, he will use privately contributed primary funds to finance his campaign. McCain will announce his vice-presidential pick most probably after Barack Obama reveals his choice, sometime in the first week of August.

This leaves just one month between the veep pick and the end of private financing for McCain’s campaign. It is unclear when Romney would raise so much money for McCain, nor when the Republican nominee would be able to use it, making Romney’s ability to provide McCain a financial boost entirely irrelevant. The New Republic’s Noam Scheiber has a similar take on the possibility that financial considerations dictate a Romney pick.

What, then, could Allen have meant? There are 3 possibilities that come to mind:

  1. McCain might be willing to tell Romney in the coming days that he will select him as his running-mate. This would be a very unlikely development, given the low odds of that remaining secret for a month and the fact that McCain is almost certainly nowhere near that stage of the process.
  2. McCain might be considering opting out of public financing. But I am very skeptical of this. He has not started raising any private money for the general, and it would be a gigantic risk for him to start doing so. His best fundraising month so far has been $21 million. If he opts out in early August, that would leave him 3 months to top the $87 million he would have received from the FEC and do so by a margin substantial enough for the political drawbacks of being hit for his flip-flop to be worthwhile.
  3. Romney’s fundraising potential could be used to raise money for the RNC, rather than McCain’s campaign. But would the candidate’s entourage be as excited about that possibility? Sure, the RNC’s resources will be absolutely critical to McCain’s presidential hopes, as the party’s spending will complement the candidate’s $87 million and reduce the gap with Obama’s spending. But McCain would not have any control of how that money is spend, as any coordination would be illegal. Furthermore, Romney has already been doing much more than was expected to raise money, in an obvious effort to campaign for VP. But he is also doing so to position himself for a future presidential run, meaning that he would be likely to continue helping the RNC in the months ahead whatever the fate of his vice-presidential ambitions.

All in all, it remains unclear what the McCain sources Mike Allen cites could have meant when talking about Romney’s fundraising potential. The first two possibilities (McCain opting out of public financing or informing Romney early) would be huge news, though they are naturally the most unlikely. This is not to say that Romney is not part of McCain’s short list (in fact, there are a lot of good reasons for a Romney pick, including the fact that McCain has little to say about the economy, which was always the area Romney was the most comfortable talking about).

As for Thune and Portman, there are both likely to make conservatives happy. Both are relatively young (born in 1961 and 1955 respectively) and Thune is already mentioned as a top contender for the upcoming presidential elections. As for Portman, a former House member who Bush appointed as U.S. Trade Representative and as Director of Management and Budget. Robert Novak has been beating the drum for Portman to be considered a top contender. But are his associations to President Bush not too strong?

Ultimately, this gets to the weakness of articles that try to propose new information about who is on the short list and what sources are saying: Since the sourcing is so vague and no one wants to be known as leaking any information, it becomes very difficult to understand what is being speculated or who is doing the speculating.

Speaking of strange veep speculation, NY Mag’s new article dissing Sebelius, Biden and Hagel as examples of how all of Obama’s choices have problems devotes the most space in its section about Sebelius to the argument (provided by one “well connected” source) that Obama could then suffer from the “very American trope about miscegenation. (…) Every time they smile at each other, it will be triggered … And that’s exactly the kind of anxiety you do not want to raise in white working-class men — the fear that this handsome, charismatic black guy is after their women.” That the article concludes that Obama’s safest and best bet is Hillary Clinton, another white woman, does undermine its coherence..

Most recent VP headlines:

  • June 28: Ridge hit by lobbying ties, NRO expands veto, Jones returns
  • June 24: Biden, Sebelius and Crist campaigning more or less overtly
  • June 20: James Jones chooses McCain, Frank warns against Nunn
  • June 16: Jindal’s exorcism problem and (more-or-less credible) Democratic denials
  • All coverage for Democrats and Republicans

0 Responses to “VP watch: Romney’s fundraising potential and the emergence of Thune and Portman”


  1. 1 Anonymous

    Romney would be an awful choice. There would be no creativity and no momentum and that’s what McCain needs.

  2. 2 Ted

    It appears that it’s all down to Alaska Gov Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney, and team Romney fears Palin now has the best shot, so Romney camp is mounting a blogosphere-wide assault via Politico.

    The tip-off that Politico is just a “promote Romney” piece is that it mentions EVERY NAME in the next two tiers of Veep prospects EXCEPT SARAH PALIN!!! — even names far more unlikely than Palin (since Romney camp knows Palin is the ONLY ONE who tops — I’ll say tops by far — Romney as McCain’s best pick).

    Bottom line, Romney and Politico fear Palin most — as do the Dems and the MSM. (By the way, the Dems and MSM do not fear Romney the most — which says a lot.)

    AOL, prime on-line pro-Obama/pro-Dem player, is now carrying the Politico piece promoting Romney buzz.

    Clearly AOL wants McCain and the GOP to lose the general elction — hence they gladly promote Romney (no mention of Palin).

    Also, CNN had Romney — kind of out of the blue — attacking Obama. Again, CNN, wanting McCain and the GOP to lose, gladly promotes Romney (to attempt to avert the Palin threat).

    All the media frenzy which will surround Palin “story” — essentially free to McCain — will be worth millions and millions of dollars of PR (more money than Romney would provide anyway).

  3. 3 Paul

    Huckabee would do more for McCain then any other vp choice, Yet the lobbyist on McCains team and the left media dont want to admit Huckabee is the best. All the polls show Huckabee is the best pick for McCain even swinging most of the southern states in McCains favor.
    On another note I believe what Clark said had nothing to do with attacking McCain, He was just stating the truth. McCain is a war hero, however being a war hero alone does not mean that you will be a good president. Shame on Obama for throwing Clark under the bus. Obama is getting to PC for his own good. We have to be able to have commentary of views and opinions without it being called an attack. Truth, is not always an attack. That said, I keep hearing rumors that Obama will be annoucing his veep this week, the only place I have been able to find any evidence supporting this is at a site called veep peek, was wondering if anyone has heard anything about these rumors or where I can read more about them.,? I thought someone here might know if there seems to be any truth behind the rumors. the only place i have been able to find anything about these rumors on the web is at the veep the site is http://www.theveep.com

  4. 4 Aaron

    HRC won’t invoke the same kind of “miscegenation” in the minds of white men as Sebelius does b/c
    1 - HRC is already perceived as more strong-willed, “rigid.” Thus, she’s probably looked upon as the dominant one in that pairing. HRC also dresses in pantsuits and her campaign is savvy enough to not evoke any kind of sexiness when out on the trail. Whereas with Sebelius, well, I’ve seen her wear skirts..let’s just say that.
    2 - HRC is already spent like 16 or so months campaigning around Obama; people are used to seeing them together. Most white men don’t know who Sebelius is, and so there minds are impressionable with Obama’s relationship with her.

  5. 5 SKE

    Romney would be an awful choice. There would be no creativity and no momentum and that’s what McCain needs.

    Where did that come from?
    If there is something I understood from Romney’s achievements and election campaign it is that this guy is highly creative and able to think new and reorganise. He is intelligent and curious about organisations and society, how they work and how to improve areas with openminded solutions, all this is at the essence of creative thinking.

  6. 6 barbara

    who the heck is Palin? Im a woman and I have no idea! There is no time to introduce someone very few people know. Most of us are concerned about the economy,Mitt is, as we all know the expert for economical issues.Why in the world would we shun an economical expert for this ticket,when having an economy pro is something the Democrats do not have????This is probably the only plus,that would make us one up, and the democrats weak!Harvard financial dgree verses what….

  1. 1 More Romney Veep Skepticism - The Stump
  2. 2 Right Thinking » Blog Archive » What the Biden pick really means

Leave a Reply