<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Democrats expanding the Senate playing field?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dsimon</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3887</link>
		<dc:creator>dsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3887</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Susan Collins is a strong incumbent. She's moderate, albeit too hawkish, seems to be socially progressive. As GOPers go, she's not bad at all. She remains popular in a state that is blue (but not as blue as one may think).&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The problem with Collins--from a blue perspective--is that she's a moderate only when it doesn't matter. From what I've heard, when there's a close vote she'll look at Mitch McConnell to see what she's supposed to do. Perhaps the election will depend on Allen's ability to show her in that light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Susan Collins is a strong incumbent. She&#8217;s moderate, albeit too hawkish, seems to be socially progressive. As GOPers go, she&#8217;s not bad at all. She remains popular in a state that is blue (but not as blue as one may think).</i></p>
<p>The problem with Collins&#8211;from a blue perspective&#8211;is that she&#8217;s a moderate only when it doesn&#8217;t matter. From what I&#8217;ve heard, when there&#8217;s a close vote she&#8217;ll look at Mitch McConnell to see what she&#8217;s supposed to do. Perhaps the election will depend on Allen&#8217;s ability to show her in that light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim West</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Susan Collins is a strong incumbent.  She's moderate, albeit too hawkish, seems to be socially progressive.  As GOPers go, she's not bad at all.  She remains popular in a state that is blue (but not as blue as one may think).  I expect her to win by 10%.  Allen is a strong candidate, and he will give her a run for her money, but I don't believe he will catch her.  I've got Maine listed as the 12th most likely to change hands.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do believe that Minnesota is not looking as a sure bet for the Dems.  I thought at one time that Minnesota would definitely change, but not as much now.  Minnesota is more likely in my mind to change than Alaska because it's a blue state.  Alaska's is one of the redist states, and although Stevens is real old and he's got some ethical issues to work out, I predict the outcome will be a Stevens win by about 1%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan Collins is a strong incumbent.  She&#8217;s moderate, albeit too hawkish, seems to be socially progressive.  As GOPers go, she&#8217;s not bad at all.  She remains popular in a state that is blue (but not as blue as one may think).  I expect her to win by 10%.  Allen is a strong candidate, and he will give her a run for her money, but I don&#8217;t believe he will catch her.  I&#8217;ve got Maine listed as the 12th most likely to change hands.</p>
<p>I do believe that Minnesota is not looking as a sure bet for the Dems.  I thought at one time that Minnesota would definitely change, but not as much now.  Minnesota is more likely in my mind to change than Alaska because it&#8217;s a blue state.  Alaska&#8217;s is one of the redist states, and although Stevens is real old and he&#8217;s got some ethical issues to work out, I predict the outcome will be a Stevens win by about 1%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeel</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3885</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3885</guid>
		<description>My take on OR, MN, NC and TX:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;OR:  Merkley had better win the primary; he got off to a late start.  Novick is just too quirky.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;MN:  I'm really thinking this one &lt;br/&gt;may be slipping away; the scandals&lt;br/&gt;may be just too much to overcome.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;NC:  Hagan needs a lot more money.&lt;br/&gt;TX:  Noriega needs a lot more money.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Both NC and TX have vulneralble incumbents, but the money gaps are huge, Dole has a 10-1 COH advantage.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm sure there will be more surprises along the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on OR, MN, NC and TX:</p>
<p>OR:  Merkley had better win the primary; he got off to a late start.  Novick is just too quirky.  </p>
<p>MN:  I&#8217;m really thinking this one <br />may be slipping away; the scandals<br />may be just too much to overcome.</p>
<p>NC:  Hagan needs a lot more money.<br />TX:  Noriega needs a lot more money.</p>
<p>Both NC and TX have vulneralble incumbents, but the money gaps are huge, Dole has a 10-1 COH advantage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there will be more surprises along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsimon</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>dsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>I'm hoping the Maine people are right too about the race shaping up after Memorial Day. Allen is a terrific candidate, and after hearing him talk on several occasions it's hard for me to understand why the contest isn't closer than it seems to be at the moment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But we'll see, one way or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping the Maine people are right too about the race shaping up after Memorial Day. Allen is a terrific candidate, and after hearing him talk on several occasions it&#8217;s hard for me to understand why the contest isn&#8217;t closer than it seems to be at the moment.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;ll see, one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KELL</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>KELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear that we are going to be getting updated Rankings for the US Senate by the end of the month (US House as well). I honestly think the Democrats can pick-up more Senate seats than House seats given how many Democratic House seats are in GOP heavy or swing districts (AL-05, FL-16, IL-14, KS-02, LA-06, MS-01?, NH-01, OR-05, PA-10, TX-22, TX-23), whereas LA-Sen is the only Democratic Senate seat even considered vulnerable. The Dems in the US House will get a net gain, just not sure if it gets to a net double digit gain.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For the US Senate, I posted this on SSP and SenateGuru as my rankings:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;SAFE TAKE-OVER: &lt;br/&gt;(1) Virginia - This seat is as safe as some incumbent Democrats. I think everyone is terrified of putting an open seat in a safe column, but it's a fact. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;LIKELY TAKE-OVER: &lt;br/&gt;(2) New Mexico - As it has to be differentiated between Virginia (safe) and New Hampshire (Lean). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;LEAN TAKE-OVER: &lt;br/&gt;(3) New Hampshire - Shaheen has consistently polled high single or low double digits against Sununu. He's probably done-zo. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;TOSS-UP: &lt;br/&gt;(4) Colorado - Advantage to Mark Udall given the environment, recent trending to Democrats in the state, the Democratic National Convention, money, and Schaffer as a candidate.  Some stronger polling will push this to a Lean or Likely Take-over.&lt;br/&gt;(5) Alaska - Advantage to Mayor Begich given scandal on Stevens, polling showing incumbent under 50%, and general mood of Alaska against the Stevens/Young ordeal.  I think this is eventually will flip.&lt;br/&gt;(6) Minnesota - Pretty even to slight GOP lean given the national environment, fundraising, GOP national convention, and polling showing Coleman inches ahead. This is about even with Oregon and North Carolina.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;LEAN RETENTION: &lt;br/&gt;(7) Oregon - Smith has money and is an incumbent, but we are voting for President in a blue state, the Democratic Primary is getting Merkley/Novick good face time, and recent polling has this within 5 points. Hold the phone! &lt;br/&gt;(8) North Carolina - Hagan is kicking some major polysci, trouncing in the primary, fundraising, and up against an incumbent (no gender advantage for Dole now) who polls under 50%, and a recent Rasmussen poll has Hagan up 1%! &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;LIKELY RETENTION: &lt;br/&gt;(9) Louisiana - I haven't seen any recent polling or the financial situation of Kennedy to show me any different&lt;br/&gt;(10) Maine - Collins isn't budging; I had high hopes for Allen, so I hope what all the Maine people say (race doesn't take shape until after Memorial Day) holds true and this gets into the Lean column sooner (rather than later). &lt;br/&gt;(11) Texas - Frmo Safe to Likely Retention given the confirmed recent polls that has this competitive, Cornyn under 50%, and Noriega polling well. &lt;br/&gt;(12) Mississippi (B) - There was early polling showing this could be interesting (more so if it was held in March as the Mississippi Constitution states IMO), but it's Mississippi, presidential election, and Cochran on the ballot right next to this race. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Remaining "Races to Watch" listed for: Oklahoma, Nebraska, &#038; Kansas. I'd also add Idaho, but not Kentucky and New Jersey (unless you are just looking from a primary perspective, no way in general).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear that we are going to be getting updated Rankings for the US Senate by the end of the month (US House as well). I honestly think the Democrats can pick-up more Senate seats than House seats given how many Democratic House seats are in GOP heavy or swing districts (AL-05, FL-16, IL-14, KS-02, LA-06, MS-01?, NH-01, OR-05, PA-10, TX-22, TX-23), whereas LA-Sen is the only Democratic Senate seat even considered vulnerable. The Dems in the US House will get a net gain, just not sure if it gets to a net double digit gain.</p>
<p>For the US Senate, I posted this on SSP and SenateGuru as my rankings:</p>
<p>SAFE TAKE-OVER: <br />(1) Virginia - This seat is as safe as some incumbent Democrats. I think everyone is terrified of putting an open seat in a safe column, but it&#8217;s a fact. </p>
<p>LIKELY TAKE-OVER: <br />(2) New Mexico - As it has to be differentiated between Virginia (safe) and New Hampshire (Lean). </p>
<p>LEAN TAKE-OVER: <br />(3) New Hampshire - Shaheen has consistently polled high single or low double digits against Sununu. He&#8217;s probably done-zo. </p>
<p>TOSS-UP: <br />(4) Colorado - Advantage to Mark Udall given the environment, recent trending to Democrats in the state, the Democratic National Convention, money, and Schaffer as a candidate.  Some stronger polling will push this to a Lean or Likely Take-over.<br />(5) Alaska - Advantage to Mayor Begich given scandal on Stevens, polling showing incumbent under 50%, and general mood of Alaska against the Stevens/Young ordeal.  I think this is eventually will flip.<br />(6) Minnesota - Pretty even to slight GOP lean given the national environment, fundraising, GOP national convention, and polling showing Coleman inches ahead. This is about even with Oregon and North Carolina.</p>
<p>LEAN RETENTION: <br />(7) Oregon - Smith has money and is an incumbent, but we are voting for President in a blue state, the Democratic Primary is getting Merkley/Novick good face time, and recent polling has this within 5 points. Hold the phone! <br />(8) North Carolina - Hagan is kicking some major polysci, trouncing in the primary, fundraising, and up against an incumbent (no gender advantage for Dole now) who polls under 50%, and a recent Rasmussen poll has Hagan up 1%! </p>
<p>LIKELY RETENTION: <br />(9) Louisiana - I haven&#8217;t seen any recent polling or the financial situation of Kennedy to show me any different<br />(10) Maine - Collins isn&#8217;t budging; I had high hopes for Allen, so I hope what all the Maine people say (race doesn&#8217;t take shape until after Memorial Day) holds true and this gets into the Lean column sooner (rather than later). <br />(11) Texas - Frmo Safe to Likely Retention given the confirmed recent polls that has this competitive, Cornyn under 50%, and Noriega polling well. <br />(12) Mississippi (B) - There was early polling showing this could be interesting (more so if it was held in March as the Mississippi Constitution states IMO), but it&#8217;s Mississippi, presidential election, and Cochran on the ballot right next to this race. </p>
<p>Remaining &#8220;Races to Watch&#8221; listed for: Oklahoma, Nebraska, &#038; Kansas. I&#8217;d also add Idaho, but not Kentucky and New Jersey (unless you are just looking from a primary perspective, no way in general).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>I always thought of Cornyn and Dole as being Senators who were going to end up in a precarious position sooner or later. For both Noriega and Hagan's sakes, I'm glad it's sooner. Considering how unpopular the Republican Party is right now, we've got a real chance to break down the "Red State v. Blue State" divide if we put our resources in the right places, and Texas and North Carolina are definitely two of them. We get so caught up in all of that that people forget how relatively recently these voting patterns have emerged, and how shallow they are - heck, if Mike Easley had jumped into this thing Elizabeth Dole would be exchanging sad, knowing glances with John Sununu on the Senate floor right about now.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rice will probably have a tough time actually knocking off Inhofe under any circumstances, but it will be interesting to see how close he comes. He's not exactly Ted Kennedy, but he's not avoiding the tag of 'liberal' like the plague either. If he ends up staying in there until the end with Inhofe anyways, he could provide a road map to success with the 50 State Strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought of Cornyn and Dole as being Senators who were going to end up in a precarious position sooner or later. For both Noriega and Hagan&#8217;s sakes, I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s sooner. Considering how unpopular the Republican Party is right now, we&#8217;ve got a real chance to break down the &#8220;Red State v. Blue State&#8221; divide if we put our resources in the right places, and Texas and North Carolina are definitely two of them. We get so caught up in all of that that people forget how relatively recently these voting patterns have emerged, and how shallow they are - heck, if Mike Easley had jumped into this thing Elizabeth Dole would be exchanging sad, knowing glances with John Sununu on the Senate floor right about now.</p>
<p>Rice will probably have a tough time actually knocking off Inhofe under any circumstances, but it will be interesting to see how close he comes. He&#8217;s not exactly Ted Kennedy, but he&#8217;s not avoiding the tag of &#8216;liberal&#8217; like the plague either. If he ends up staying in there until the end with Inhofe anyways, he could provide a road map to success with the 50 State Strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>The surge in registration especially orchestrated by the Obama campaign will help candidates down the ticket. Obama does put some extra states in play such as NC and CO which should help the senatorial candidates.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also most Clinton and Obama supporters will vote for the eventual nominee - there is no question. There have been heated races before (Carter/Kennedy for example) and voters come home by Nov.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The surge in registration especially orchestrated by the Obama campaign will help candidates down the ticket. Obama does put some extra states in play such as NC and CO which should help the senatorial candidates.</p>
<p>Also most Clinton and Obama supporters will vote for the eventual nominee - there is no question. There have been heated races before (Carter/Kennedy for example) and voters come home by Nov.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fritz</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3880</link>
		<dc:creator>fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3880</guid>
		<description>I think it is hard to over-estimate the affect of the Democratic primary race on down ballot races. As each state primary race played out millions of apathitic Democrates as well as disgruntled Independents and Republicans got involved and saw that weak Republican senators in traditionly safe seats could be defeated. Voters are seeing that Cornyn, Dole, Stevens, Inhofe to name a few; are beatable with a strong Democratic nominee and good fundraising. The same thing is happening in the house and goveners races as well. It could all change but with each passing week it looks better for the Democrates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is hard to over-estimate the affect of the Democratic primary race on down ballot races. As each state primary race played out millions of apathitic Democrates as well as disgruntled Independents and Republicans got involved and saw that weak Republican senators in traditionly safe seats could be defeated. Voters are seeing that Cornyn, Dole, Stevens, Inhofe to name a few; are beatable with a strong Democratic nominee and good fundraising. The same thing is happening in the house and goveners races as well. It could all change but with each passing week it looks better for the Democrates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim West</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3879</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3879</guid>
		<description>Taniel,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Can you update your senate rankings?  My order of most likely to change hands:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(1)  Virginia&lt;br/&gt;(2)  New Mexico&lt;br/&gt;(3)  New Hampshire&lt;br/&gt;(4)  Colorado&lt;br/&gt;(5)  Minnesota&lt;br/&gt;(6)  Alaska&lt;br/&gt;(7)  Louisiana&lt;br/&gt;(8)  Oregon&lt;br/&gt;(9)  North Carolina&lt;br/&gt;(10) Mississippi (Wicker)&lt;br/&gt;(11) Texas&lt;br/&gt;(12) Maine&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don't see how any other state (at this time) could change over.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(1)-(4) I considder will likely change&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(5)-(6)  Toss up&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(7)-(12) Too close for comfort&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don't see Oklahoma opening up at this point.  Unless Inhofe does something really dumb, he's safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taniel,</p>
<p>Can you update your senate rankings?  My order of most likely to change hands:</p>
<p>(1)  Virginia<br />(2)  New Mexico<br />(3)  New Hampshire<br />(4)  Colorado<br />(5)  Minnesota<br />(6)  Alaska<br />(7)  Louisiana<br />(8)  Oregon<br />(9)  North Carolina<br />(10) Mississippi (Wicker)<br />(11) Texas<br />(12) Maine</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how any other state (at this time) could change over.  </p>
<p>(1)-(4) I considder will likely change</p>
<p>(5)-(6)  Toss up</p>
<p>(7)-(12) Too close for comfort</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Oklahoma opening up at this point.  Unless Inhofe does something really dumb, he&#8217;s safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/comment-page-1/#comment-3878</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/are-democrats-expanding-the-senate-playing-field/#comment-3878</guid>
		<description>NOw, that NC poll is fascinating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOw, that NC poll is fascinating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
