<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire results thread: McCain triumphs, Clinton completes an improbable come-back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/</link>
	<description>Obsessive political analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Rational</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Rational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Who would ever have believed that a narrow win for Hillary Clinton in an early primary would be construed as showing signs of vitality from her campaign?  And yet, here we are...  What a strange election!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, where to from here?  My guess is that Clinton spins her no-doubt strong Michigan showing into another sign of vitality, even though she's basically unopposed.  (To my MI friends:  Is Dodd still on the ballot there, even after his dropout?)  Then she probably hopes for a good result in the non-binding preference poll in NV, where she was leading big in the last poll I saw (caveat:  a month old now).  A win there, and she can argue her case for the "big mo" going into SC.  But the case will be weak, and Obama is likely to still be strong.  It's definitely a two-horse race, and an exciting one.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Taniel, very much agree with you on the McCain storyline for Michigan.  Romney is polling well among Republicans, but the national storyline now has McCain as a serious contender, which means he should get his fair share...and he should do better among independents there.  A win in MI would improve his showing in SC and probably help him grab NV on the same day.  Then he could well take advantage of Rudy's fall to win in FL, in which case he's the odds-on favorite going into Tsunami Tuesday.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A thought, though:  What happens if Romney comes out on top in Michigan?  It's not unlikely, considering his background and the numbers...and then we'd have three states, three winners at that point.  (WY barely counts, it's such a closed process.)  Thompson could muddy the picture even more with any kind of strong showing in SC.  So NV and FL might well become the battlegrounds where the GOP nom is decided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would ever have believed that a narrow win for Hillary Clinton in an early primary would be construed as showing signs of vitality from her campaign?  And yet, here we are&#8230;  What a strange election!</p>
<p>So, where to from here?  My guess is that Clinton spins her no-doubt strong Michigan showing into another sign of vitality, even though she&#8217;s basically unopposed.  (To my MI friends:  Is Dodd still on the ballot there, even after his dropout?)  Then she probably hopes for a good result in the non-binding preference poll in NV, where she was leading big in the last poll I saw (caveat:  a month old now).  A win there, and she can argue her case for the &#8220;big mo&#8221; going into SC.  But the case will be weak, and Obama is likely to still be strong.  It&#8217;s definitely a two-horse race, and an exciting one.</p>
<p>Taniel, very much agree with you on the McCain storyline for Michigan.  Romney is polling well among Republicans, but the national storyline now has McCain as a serious contender, which means he should get his fair share&#8230;and he should do better among independents there.  A win in MI would improve his showing in SC and probably help him grab NV on the same day.  Then he could well take advantage of Rudy&#8217;s fall to win in FL, in which case he&#8217;s the odds-on favorite going into Tsunami Tuesday.</p>
<p>A thought, though:  What happens if Romney comes out on top in Michigan?  It&#8217;s not unlikely, considering his background and the numbers&#8230;and then we&#8217;d have three states, three winners at that point.  (WY barely counts, it&#8217;s such a closed process.)  Thompson could muddy the picture even more with any kind of strong showing in SC.  So NV and FL might well become the battlegrounds where the GOP nom is decided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>No way was Obama's speech 'powerful'.  You could see the disappointment in his eyes and it was weak and empty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way was Obama&#8217;s speech &#8216;powerful&#8217;.  You could see the disappointment in his eyes and it was weak and empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Slav</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Slav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>With 47% precincts reporting, Hillary's got a 4,100 vote lead.  Hillary's appeal should not be discounted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 47% precincts reporting, Hillary&#8217;s got a 4,100 vote lead.  Hillary&#8217;s appeal should not be discounted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Slav</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Slav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>It's important not to throw to much dirt for Hillary's grave quite yet.  NH does not want to be responsible for the destruction of Hillary's Presidential ambitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important not to throw to much dirt for Hillary&#8217;s grave quite yet.  NH does not want to be responsible for the destruction of Hillary&#8217;s Presidential ambitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>where are you getting your numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where are you getting your numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>I don't know about all this, but it looks like John McCain is going to win this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about all this, but it looks like John McCain is going to win this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: app state</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>app state</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>I think what is meant by this is that out of the GOP voters, 30% are Independents.  Out of the Democratic voters, 40% are Independents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what is meant by this is that out of the GOP voters, 30% are Independents.  Out of the Democratic voters, 40% are Independents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Scratch that, Marc Ambinder may have a typo on his site.  He says "3 in 10 independents are GOP voters," but I think he might be the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scratch that, Marc Ambinder may have a typo on his site.  He says &#8220;3 in 10 independents are GOP voters,&#8221; but I think he might be the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>70% of registered independents voted in the Democratic primary.  That's the more relevant number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>70% of registered independents voted in the Democratic primary.  That&#8217;s the more relevant number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-results-thread-mccain-triumphs-clinton-completes-an-improbable-come-back/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>". . . if all of the independents are voting, they're going to go Obama over McCain, fosho."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That has got to be the most ridiculous thing I've heard for some time.  Obama is not that popular.  My feeling is that this means that McCain is getting his fair shake of indies, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. . . if all of the independents are voting, they&#8217;re going to go Obama over McCain, fosho.&#8221;</p>
<p>That has got to be the most ridiculous thing I&#8217;ve heard for some time.  Obama is not that popular.  My feeling is that this means that McCain is getting his fair shake of indies, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
